Literature DB >> 16814792

Low-magnitude mechanical signals that stimulate bone formation in the ovariectomized rat are dependent on the applied frequency but not on the strain magnitude.

Stefan Judex1, Xin Lei, Daniel Han, Clinton Rubin.   

Abstract

There is growing evidence that extremely small mechanical signals, if applied at a sufficiently high frequency, can serve as anabolic signals to bone tissue. To determine if the responsiveness of bone to low-magnitude, high-frequency parameters is modulated by endocrine imbalance, ovariectomized (OVX) Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to whole body vibrations (WBV, 0.15 g) at 45 Hz (n=6) or 90 Hz (n=6) for 10 min/day, and compared to OVX age-matched controls (n=6). Five additional rats were used, in vivo, to establish the induced bone surface strain magnitudes (and strain rates). Following a 28 d protocol, bone formation rates in the metaphysis of the proximal tibia were 159% greater in 90 Hz rats when compared to age-matched controls, but 45 Hz rats were not significantly different from controls. Bone morphology of 90 Hz rats indicated significantly greater trabecular bone volume (22% and 25%) and thicker trabeculae (11% and 12%) over either controls or 45 Hz rats in the epiphysis of the distal femur, respectively. Despite the enhanced sensitivity of the skeleton towards the 90 Hz signal, the strain magnitudes and strain rates induced by this frequency were significantly lower than during 45 Hz vibration, suggesting that factors other than matrix strain are driving the anabolic response. Ideally, such mechanical signals represent a non-pharmacologic means of controlling bone mass and morphology in spite of systemic pressures for bone resorption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16814792     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  94 in total

1.  The relationship between bone mechanical properties and ground reaction forces in normal and hypermuscular mice.

Authors:  Daniel Schmitt; Ann C Zumwalt; Mark W Hamrick
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol       Date:  2010-07-01

2.  In vivo assessment of the effect of controlled high- and low-frequency mechanical loading on peri-implant bone healing.

Authors:  Xiaolei Zhang; Katleen Vandamme; Antonia Torcasio; Toru Ogawa; G Harry van Lenthe; Ignace Naert; Joke Duyck
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Marrow adipogenesis and bone loss that parallels estrogen deficiency is slowed by low-intensity mechanical signals.

Authors:  D Krishnamoorthy; D M Frechette; B J Adler; D E Green; M E Chan; C T Rubin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Mechanical vibration inhibits osteoclast formation by reducing DC-STAMP receptor expression in osteoclast precursor cells.

Authors:  Rishikesh N Kulkarni; Philip A Voglewede; Dawei Liu
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Mechanical stimulation of mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and differentiation promotes osteogenesis while preventing dietary-induced obesity.

Authors:  Yen Kim Luu; Encarnacion Capilla; Clifford J Rosen; Vicente Gilsanz; Jeffrey E Pessin; Stefan Judex; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Extremely small-magnitude accelerations enhance bone regeneration: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Soon Jung Hwang; Svetlana Lublinsky; Young-Kwon Seo; In Sook Kim; Stefan Judex
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Vibrational stimulation induces osteoblast differentiation and the upregulation of osteogenic gene expression in vitro.

Authors:  Takeru Ota; Mirei Chiba; Haruhide Hayashi
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 8.  Vibration as an exercise modality: how it may work, and what its potential might be.

Authors:  Jörn Rittweger
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Whole Body Vibration Reduces Inflammatory Bone Loss in a Lipopolysaccharide Murine Model.

Authors:  I S Kim; B Lee; S J Yoo; S J Hwang
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 6.116

10.  The effects of photobiomodulation and low-amplitude high-frequency vibration on bone healing process: a comparative study.

Authors:  M Rajaei Jafarabadi; G Rouhi; G Kaka; S H Sadraie; J Arum
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.