Literature DB >> 16814475

Demographic differences in support for smoking policy interventions.

Jennifer M Doucet1, Wayne F Velicer, Robert G Laforge.   

Abstract

The Smoking Policy Inventory (SPI) is a 35-item scale, which measures attitudes towards tobacco control policies. The five dimensions of the SPI are advertising and promotion, public education, laws and penalties, taxes and fees, and restrictions on smoking. The SPI has been applied to different samples, both in the USA and internationally. However, no one has investigated if there is differential support for policy intervention among subgroups within the USA. This study investigated subgroup differences on five demographic variables (gender, age, race, ethnicity, and education) across the five dimensions of the SPI. A random digit dial sample of 506 adult participants from the United States was analyzed with five MANOVAs and follow-up ANOVAs. Men (N=188) had significantly (p<0.05) less favorable attitudes towards tobacco control policies than women (N=317) on all five scales. Blacks (N=52) had significantly (p<0.05) more favorable attitudes than whites (N=410) on increasing public education. There were no significant differences between Hispanics (N=21) and non-Hispanics (N=469). Older people were significantly (p<0.05) more supportive of restrictions on advertising and promotion, increasing public education, and increasing environmental restrictions. More educated people were significantly (p<0.05) more supportive of increasing taxes and fees and increasing environmental restrictions. These subgroup differences could be employed to guide the targeting of changes in policies and interventions to the specific concerns of the various groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16814475     DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Behav        ISSN: 0306-4603            Impact factor:   3.913


  17 in total

1.  Smoking behaviors and attitudes during adolescence prospectively predict support for tobacco control policies in adulthood.

Authors:  Jonathan T Macy; Laurie Chassin; Clark C Presson
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Public Support for Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act Point-of-Sale Provisions: Results of a National Study.

Authors:  Shyanika W Rose; Sherry L Emery; Susan Ennett; Heath Luz McNaughton Reyes; John C Scott; Kurt M Ribisl
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The association between implicit and explicit attitudes toward smoking and support for tobacco control measures.

Authors:  Jonathan T Macy; Laurie Chassin; Clark C Presson
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Public support for mandated nicotine reduction in cigarettes.

Authors:  Jennifer L Pearson; David B Abrams; Raymond S Niaura; Amanda Richardson; Donna M Vallone
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  College student reactions to smoking bans in public, on campus and at home.

Authors:  Carla J Berg; Laura Lessard; Pratibha P Parelkar; James Thrasher; Michelle C Kegler; Cam Escoffery; Kathryn Goldade; Jasjit S Ahluwalia
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2010-12-01

6.  The role of reported tobacco-specific media exposure on adult attitudes towards proposed policies to limit the portrayal of smoking in movies.

Authors:  Kelly D Blake; K Viswanath; Robert J Blendon; Donna Vallone
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  The role of tobacco-specific media exposure, knowledge, and smoking status on selected attitudes toward tobacco control.

Authors:  Kelly D Blake; K Viswanath; Robert J Blendon; Donna Vallone
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  Creating the "desired mindset": Philip Morris's efforts to improve its corporate image among women.

Authors:  Patricia A McDaniel; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

9.  Testing demographic differences for alcohol use initiation among adolescents for the decisional balance and situational temptation prevention inventories.

Authors:  Marie A Sillice; Andrea L Paiva; Steven F Babbin; Heather A McGee; Joseph S Rossi; Colleen A Redding; Kathryn S Meier; Karin Oatley; Wayne F Velicer
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.913

10.  Support for smoke-free policies: a nationwide analysis of immigrants, US-born, and other demographic groups, 1995-2002.

Authors:  Theresa L Osypuk; Dolores Acevedo-Garcia
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.