BACKGROUND: It is not clear which educational strategy is most effective in helping patients to change their lifestyles. This study compared the efficacy of two different educational models on reducing blood pressure (BP). METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial in ambulatory hypertensive patients >65 years of age. Workshops that aimed to develop self-management and patient empowerment (PEM) were compared to workshops that used a compliance-based model (CEM). The primary outcome was change in systolic BP at 3 months compared with basal values between groups (net reduction), measured by 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were educated with PEM and 30 others with CM. Both groups were statistically similar with regard to age (67 v 70 years), systolic BP (157 v 156 mm Hg) and diastolic BP (88 v 88 mm Hg), diabetes (23% v 31%), and basal natriuresis 116 v 121 mEq/day). There were more women in the PEM group (57% v 30%). The PEM group showed a significant reduction of 8 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI] 2 to 15), whereas the CM group showed a reduction of 3 mm Hg (95% CI -3 to 8), with a net reduction of 6 (95% CI -3 to 14). Mean net night-time systolic BP reduction was 12 mm Hg (95% CI 2 to 22). BP control was 70% in PEM group vs 45% in CM group (P = 0.045). The relative odds ratio for BP control for the PEM group after adjustment for age, sex, diabetes, basal blood pressure and changes in pharmacological treatment was 3.7 (95% CI 1.05 to 13.1). CONCLUSION: Based on these study results, the self-management education model was significantly more effective than the compliance-based model in BP control.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: It is not clear which educational strategy is most effective in helping patients to change their lifestyles. This study compared the efficacy of two different educational models on reducing blood pressure (BP). METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial in ambulatory hypertensivepatients >65 years of age. Workshops that aimed to develop self-management and patient empowerment (PEM) were compared to workshops that used a compliance-based model (CEM). The primary outcome was change in systolic BP at 3 months compared with basal values between groups (net reduction), measured by 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were educated with PEM and 30 others with CM. Both groups were statistically similar with regard to age (67 v 70 years), systolic BP (157 v 156 mm Hg) and diastolic BP (88 v 88 mm Hg), diabetes (23% v 31%), and basal natriuresis 116 v 121 mEq/day). There were more women in the PEM group (57% v 30%). The PEM group showed a significant reduction of 8 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI] 2 to 15), whereas the CM group showed a reduction of 3 mm Hg (95% CI -3 to 8), with a net reduction of 6 (95% CI -3 to 14). Mean net night-time systolic BP reduction was 12 mm Hg (95% CI 2 to 22). BP control was 70% in PEM group vs 45% in CM group (P = 0.045). The relative odds ratio for BP control for the PEM group after adjustment for age, sex, diabetes, basal blood pressure and changes in pharmacological treatment was 3.7 (95% CI 1.05 to 13.1). CONCLUSION: Based on these study results, the self-management education model was significantly more effective than the compliance-based model in BP control.
Authors: Karen L Margolis; Tessa J Kerby; Stephen E Asche; Anna R Bergdall; Michael V Maciosek; Patrick J O'Connor; JoAnn M Sperl-Hillen Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2012-04-01 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Mohammad Hossein Baghianimoghadam; Zohreh Rahaee; Mohammad Ali Morowatisharifabad; Gholamreza Sharifirad; Abas Andishmand; Leila Azadbakht Journal: J Res Med Sci Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 1.852