Literature DB >> 16813947

Precise characterization of renal parenchymal response to single and multiple cryoablation probes.

Kyle J Weld1, Greg Hruby, Peter A Humphrey, Caroline D Ames, Jaime Landman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We characterized the size and shape of the ablated area, and the surrounding indeterminate zone associated with renal cryolesions produced by single and multiple cryoablation probe configurations in a porcine model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Laparoscopic cryoablation, consisting of 2, 10-minute double freeze cycles followed by a 3-minute active thaw, was performed in 18 pigs. Three groups of 6 pigs each were studied, including a single IceRod, 3 rods arranged in a triangular configuration 2 cm apart from each other and 4 rods arranged in a quadratic configuration 2 cm from each other. Cryoablated kidneys were harvested after 14 days for histopathological evaluation.
RESULTS: The mean diameter of the area of complete ablation produced by a 1, 3 and 4 rod configuration 1 cm from the tip of the rod was 2.0, 4.4 and 4.9 cm, respectively. Cryolesions were elliptical with 1 cryoablation probe and in the 3 and 4 rod configurations they conformed to triangular and quadratic cross-sectional shapes, respectively. In the zone, ablation a single small focus of peri-arteriolar renal cell viability was noted less than 1 mm from the edge of the cryolesion in 1 of the 18 cryolesions. Otherwise no viable renal cells were detected.
CONCLUSIONS: Multirod configurations can be used with templates to space cryoablation probes 2 cm apart from each other with reliable and complete ablation overlap between the rods. However, around larger blood vessels the ice ball must be extended to a larger margin to ensure complete tissue ablation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16813947     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  Nonthermal Ablation by Using Intravascular Oxygen Radical Generation with WST11: Dynamic Tissue Effects and Implications for Focal Therapy.

Authors:  Simon Y Kimm; Tatum V Tarin; Sébastien Monette; Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli; Daniel Gerber; Jeremy C Durack; Stephen B Solomon; Peter T Scardino; Avigdor Scherz; Jonathan Coleman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Optimal freeze cycle length for renal cryotherapy.

Authors:  Jennifer Lee Young; Elham Khanifar; Navneet Narula; Cervando Gerardo Ortiz-Vanderdys; Surendra Babu Kolla; Donald Lowell Pick; Petros George Sountoulides; Oskar Grau Kaufmann; Kathryn Elizabeth Osann; Victor Buu Huynh; Adam Geoffrey Kaplan; Lorena Aurora Andrade; Michael Ken Louie; Elspeth Marguerita McDougall; Ralph Victor Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Are multiple cryoprobes additive or synergistic in renal cryotherapy?

Authors:  Jennifer L Young; David W McCormick; Surrendra B Kolla; Petros G Sountoulides; Oskar G Kaufmann; Cervando G Ortiz-Vanderdys; Victor B Huynh; Adam G Kaplan; Nick S Jain; Donald L Pick; Lorena A Andrade; Kathryn E Osann; Elspeth M McDougall; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 4.  Renal cryoablation - a practical guide for interventional radiologists.

Authors:  Matthew Seager; Shankar Kumar; Emma Lim; Graham Munneke; Steve Bandula; Miles Walkden
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Modeling Cryotherapy Ice Ball Dimensions and Isotherms in a Novel Gel-based Model to Determine Optimal Cryo-needle Configurations and Settings for Potential Use in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Taimur T Shah; Uri Arbel; Sonja Foss; Andrew Zachman; Simon Rodney; Hashim U Ahmed; Manit Arya
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  The Impact of Placement Errors on the Tumor Coverage in MRI-Guided Focal Cryoablation of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Pedro Moreira; Kemal Tuncali; Clare M Tempany; Junichi Tokuda
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 5.482

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.