Josef Bailer1, M Witthöft, F Rist. 1. Department of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, 68072 Mannheim, Germany. bailer@zi-mannheim.de
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the psychometric qualities of a brief screening measure for idiopathic environmental intolerance (IEI), the Chemical Odor Sensitivity Scale (COSS). METHODOLOGY: The COSS was administered together with other measures of environmental sensitivity, IEI, and symptom scales in large samples (students, individuals with IEI, and individuals without IEI). RESULTS: The COSS achieved high internal consistency (.88 < or = Cronbach's alpha < or = .96) and good factorial, convergent, and discriminant validity across diverse samples. In a longitudinal sample, the COSS and other IEI features were stable across time. According to receiver operating characteristic analyses, the COSS performs adequately in screening individuals likely to meet case criteria for IEI. CONCLUSIONS: The favorable psychometric qualities of the COSS recommend the scale as a useful tool both for assessing self-reported chemical odor sensitivity as a vulnerability marker and for screening for IEI.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the psychometric qualities of a brief screening measure for idiopathic environmental intolerance (IEI), the Chemical Odor Sensitivity Scale (COSS). METHODOLOGY: The COSS was administered together with other measures of environmental sensitivity, IEI, and symptom scales in large samples (students, individuals with IEI, and individuals without IEI). RESULTS: The COSS achieved high internal consistency (.88 < or = Cronbach's alpha < or = .96) and good factorial, convergent, and discriminant validity across diverse samples. In a longitudinal sample, the COSS and other IEI features were stable across time. According to receiver operating characteristic analyses, the COSS performs adequately in screening individuals likely to meet case criteria for IEI. CONCLUSIONS: The favorable psychometric qualities of the COSS recommend the scale as a useful tool both for assessing self-reported chemical odor sensitivity as a vulnerability marker and for screening for IEI.
Authors: Marlene Pacharra; Stefan Kleinbeck; Michael Schäper; Meinolf Blaszkewicz; Christoph van Thriel Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2016-04-28 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: David C Houghton; Samuel L Howard; Thomas W Uhde; Caitlin Paquet; Rodney J Schlosser; Bernadette M Cortese Journal: CNS Spectr Date: 2018-09-27 Impact factor: 3.790
Authors: Pia Nynäs; Sarkku Vilpas; Elina Kankare; Jussi Karjalainen; Lauri Lehtimäki; Jura Numminen; Antti Tikkakoski; Leenamaija Kleemola; Heini Huhtala; Jukka Uitti Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Maureen Y Lichtveld; Hannah H Covert; Mya Sherman; Arti Shankar; Jeffrey K Wickliffe; Cecilia S Alcala Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-10-28 Impact factor: 3.390