Literature DB >> 16813813

Nasogastric feeding tube placement in patients with esophageal cancer: application of ultrathin transnasal endoscopy.

Cheng-Hui Lin1, Nai-Jen Liu, Ching-Song Lee, Jui-Hsiang Tang, Kuo-Liang Wei, Chun Yang, Kai-Feng Sung, Chi-Liang Cheng, Cheng-Tang Chiu, Pang-Chi Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with esophageal cancer often present with dysphagia and malnutrition. Obstructive symptoms may improve after radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Nutrition support via a nasogastric tube (NG) or gastrostomy is very important during treatment. The newly developed ultrathin endoscope (Olympus, GIF-N230, outer diameter: 6 mm) has a smaller diameter than the standard endoscope and can be introduced into the esophagus via the nasal cavity. This article reports on the use of an ultrathin endoscope for NG placement for patients with esophageal cancer who presented with dysphagia and failed traditional NG tube placement.
METHODS: A consecutive series of 40 patients with esophageal cancer were referred to our hospital from November 2001 to October 2002 for endoscopic placement of NG tubes due to failure of traditional methods of NG placement. An ultrathin endoscope was used to advance the guidewire into the stomach via the nasal cavity. After withdrawal of the scope, the NG tube was inserted over the guidewire under fluoroscopy. OBSERVATIONS: A total of 71 procedures were performed in 40 patients (37 males, 3 females), age 57 +/- 15 years (range, 37-91 y). Seventy procedures (99%) were successful in completing NG tube placement by using an ultrathin transnasal endoscope. Only one procedure failed because the esophageal lumen was completely occluded and the guidewire was not able to be passed through the obstructed site. The average duration that the NG tube was left in place was 49 +/- 35 days (range, 2-144 days). No procedure-related complications, such as bleeding or perforation, occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Using ultrathin transnasal endoscopy to place an NG tube for esophageal cancer patients is effective and safe. It simplifies the procedures and increases the success rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16813813     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.12.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  7 in total

1.  Endoscopic placement of enteral feeding tubes.

Authors:  Gerard P Rafferty; Tony Ck Tham
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-05-16

2.  Transnasal route: new approach to endoscopy.

Authors:  Sun-Young Lee; Takashi Kawai
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.519

3.  Transnasal endoscopy: no gagging no panic!

Authors:  Clare Parker; Estratios Alexandridis; John Plevris; James O'Hara; Simon Panter
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-02

4.  Role of ultrathin transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy: experience with 50 patients.

Authors:  Avnish Kumar Seth; Pankaj Puri; Alok Chandra
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-01-27

5.  Novel Visual Nasogastric Tube Insertion System: A Feasibility and Efficiency Study in a Manikin.

Authors:  Qiaoya Li; Juan Xie; Jinxing Wu; Rui Guo; Wenwen Ma; Gang Xu; Min Yang; Huisheng Deng
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.260

6.  Exercise-based dysphagia rehabilitation for adults with oesophageal cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anna Gillman; Michelle Hayes; Greg Sheaf; Margaret Walshe; John V Reynolds; Julie Regan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  The difficult intraoperative nasogastric tube intubation: A review of the literature and a novel approach.

Authors:  Yiu-Hei Ching; Stephanie M Socias; David J Ciesla; Rachel A Karlnoski; Enrico M Camporesi; Devanand Mangar
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2014-03-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.