OBJECTIVE: To quantify the electromyographic activity in the shoulder girdle musculature during scapulothoracic exercises performed in a shoulder immobilizer in asymptomatic men. DESIGN: Descriptive. SETTING: Motion analysis laboratory at a tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: Five asymptomatic male volunteers ages 24 to 32 years. INTERVENTION: Fine-wire (supraspinatus, infraspinatus, upper subscapularis) and surface (deltoids, trapezii, biceps, serratus anterior) electrodes recorded electromyographic activity from each muscle during scapular clock, elevation, depression, protraction, and retraction exercises completed during a single testing session in random order. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean peak normalized (percentage of maximal voluntary contraction [MVC]) electromyographic activity of each muscle during each exercise. RESULTS: Biceps activity was uniformly low (<20% MVC), whereas upper subscapularis activity was uniformly high (40%-63% MVC). Both scapular depression and protraction elicited low activity (<20% MVC) in the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, anterior deltoid, and biceps brachii muscles, while generally producing greater than 20% MVC activity in the trapezii and serratus. Scapular depression produced the largest serratus anterior activity (47% MVC). CONCLUSIONS: These data are the first to describe the electromyographic activity during scapulothoracic exercises while in a shoulder immobilizer. Based on electrophysiologic data in normal volunteers, our findings suggest that during periods of shoulder immobilization: (1) scapular depression and protraction exercises could potentially be safely performed after rotator cuff repair to facilitate scapulothoracic rehabilitation, (2) all exercises studied could potentially be safe after superior labral anteroposterior shoulder repair, and (3) all exercises studied should be avoided after subscapularis repair. Further investigation in symptomatic individuals may facilitate refinement of these recommendations.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the electromyographic activity in the shoulder girdle musculature during scapulothoracic exercises performed in a shoulder immobilizer in asymptomatic men. DESIGN: Descriptive. SETTING: Motion analysis laboratory at a tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: Five asymptomatic male volunteers ages 24 to 32 years. INTERVENTION: Fine-wire (supraspinatus, infraspinatus, upper subscapularis) and surface (deltoids, trapezii, biceps, serratus anterior) electrodes recorded electromyographic activity from each muscle during scapular clock, elevation, depression, protraction, and retraction exercises completed during a single testing session in random order. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean peak normalized (percentage of maximal voluntary contraction [MVC]) electromyographic activity of each muscle during each exercise. RESULTS: Biceps activity was uniformly low (<20% MVC), whereas upper subscapularis activity was uniformly high (40%-63% MVC). Both scapular depression and protraction elicited low activity (<20% MVC) in the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, anterior deltoid, and biceps brachii muscles, while generally producing greater than 20% MVC activity in the trapezii and serratus. Scapular depression produced the largest serratus anterior activity (47% MVC). CONCLUSIONS: These data are the first to describe the electromyographic activity during scapulothoracic exercises while in a shoulder immobilizer. Based on electrophysiologic data in normal volunteers, our findings suggest that during periods of shoulder immobilization: (1) scapular depression and protraction exercises could potentially be safely performed after rotator cuff repair to facilitate scapulothoracic rehabilitation, (2) all exercises studied could potentially be safe after superior labral anteroposterior shoulder repair, and (3) all exercises studied should be avoided after subscapularis repair. Further investigation in symptomatic individuals may facilitate refinement of these recommendations.
Authors: Olivier A van der Meijden; Paul Westgard; Zachary Chandler; Trevor R Gaskill; Dirk Kokmeyer; Peter J Millett Journal: Int J Sports Phys Ther Date: 2012-04