Literature DB >> 16813592

Pathological assessment of rectal carcinoma after preoperative therapy.

A C Wotherspoon1.   

Abstract

Increasingly neoadjuvant therapy is being used to improve outcomes in patients with rectal carcinoma in which the circumferential resection margins are considered to be at risk for involvement if primary surgery were to be undertaken. Assessment of the response to this approach relies on radiological examination, particularly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. Following definitive surgery, careful histological examination allows full assessment of the tumour response to these preoperative approaches. Histological examination requires careful fixation, examination of the entire area occupied by the tumour prior to down-staging and careful lymph node harvesting. Adequate fixation helps in these endeavours and the lymph node harvest appears to be unaffected by neoadjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy. Correlation between preoperative assessment of response by MRI and the subsequent histological assessment is close, but the presence of isolated residual neoplastic glands in a post-treatment fibrotic stroma is impossible to detect prior to resection. The clinical significance of these microscopic foci remains uncertain, particularly in view of the prolonged tumour doubling time associated with colorectal adenocarcinoma. The preoperative discussion with the patient requires a synthesis of their own scan results and the experience of detailed clinico-pathological studies. While MRI frequently predicts the presence or absence of residual tumour the possibility of under-staging remains and this is of crucial importance if a 'watch and wait' policy is to be adopted following apparent complete clinical and radiological remission. The significance of potential residual microscopic disease in patients with apparent radiological complete remission needs further investigation but may need to be interpreted in individual patients in the context of overall life-expectancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16813592     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01070.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  4 in total

1.  Accomplishments in 2008 in the adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Brian Czito; Florian Lordick
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09

2.  MRI staging of low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Oliver C Shihab; Brendan J Moran; Richard J Heald; Philip Quirke; Gina Brown
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in rectal cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Michael R Torkzad; Lars Påhlman; Bengt Glimelius
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-08-15

4.  Trend and risk factors of diverticulosis in Japan: age, gender, and lifestyle/metabolic-related factors may cooperatively affect on the colorectal diverticula formation.

Authors:  Nobutake Yamamichi; Takeshi Shimamoto; Yu Takahashi; Yoshiki Sakaguchi; Hikaru Kakimoto; Rie Matsuda; Yosuke Kataoka; Itaru Saito; Yosuke Tsuji; Seiichi Yakabi; Chihiro Takeuchi; Chihiro Minatsuki; Keiko Niimi; Itsuko Asada-Hirayama; Chiemi Nakayama; Satoshi Ono; Shinya Kodashima; Daisuke Yamaguchi; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; Yutaka Yamaji; Ryoichi Wada; Toru Mitsushima; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.