Literature DB >> 16813590

A personal view on laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

T D Cecil1, N Taffinder, A M Gudgeon.   

Abstract

Benefits such as reduced morbidity and shorter length of stay have been demonstrated for laparoscopic colon cancer resection, Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery is thought to be more challenging and it is not clear if it offers the same benefits. There are concerns about oncological outcome and anastomotic technique and complications. In this review we discuss the difficulties and challenges of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery within the context of our own personal experience and with regard to some of the current literature. We propose that laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgery both have a role and the challenge is selection of appropriate patients for each technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16813590     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01068.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  10 in total

1.  Totally robotic rectal resection: an experience of the first 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  J Ahmed; M Nasir; K Flashman; J Khan; A Parvaiz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Robotic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence.

Authors:  E H Aly
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Evolution of Surgical Treatment for Rectal Cancer: a Review.

Authors:  Sanjeev Dayal; Nick Battersby; Tom Cecil
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Meta-analysis of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in management of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Shahin Hajibandeh; Shahab Hajibandeh; Mokhtar Eltair; Anil T George; Vijay Thumbe; Andrew W Torrance; Misra Budhoo; Howard Joy; Rajeev Peravali
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence.

Authors:  Emad H Aly
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Transperineal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer on the residual rectum after multiple abdominal surgeries in a patient with Crohn's disease: a case report.

Authors:  Shin Emoto; Shigenori Homma; Tadashi Yoshida; Nobuki Ichikawa; Yoichi Miyaoka; Hiroki Matsui; Ryo Takahashi; Keita Ishido; Takuya Otsuka; Tomoko Mitsuhashi; Takehiko Katsurada; Akinobu Taketomi
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2021-05-13

Review 7.  Total mesorectal excision laparoscopic versus transanal approach for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Salvatore Lo Bianco; Katia Lanzafame; Caterina Domenica Piazza; Vincenzo Gaetano Piazza; Daniele Provenzano; Diego Piazza
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-01-24

Review 8.  Minimally invasive surgery and cancer: controversies part 1.

Authors:  Melanie Goldfarb; Steven Brower; S D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcomes.

Authors:  Sapho Xenia Roodbeen; Marta Penna; Hugh Mackenzie; Miranda Kusters; Andrew Slater; Oliver M Jones; Ian Lindsey; Richard J Guy; Chris Cunningham; Roel Hompes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Does oncological outcome differ between restorative and nonrestorative low anterior resection in patients with primary rectal cancer?

Authors:  Sapho X Roodbeen; Robin D Blok; Wernard A Borstlap; Willem A Bemelman; Roel Hompes; Pieter J Tanis
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.788

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.