Literature DB >> 16813439

Comparison of cervical disk implants and cervical disk fusion treatments in human cadaveric models.

M A Davies1, S C Bryant, S P Larsen, D B Murrey, D S Nussman, E B Laxer, B V Darden.   

Abstract

Articulating cervical disk implants have been proposed as an alternative to disk fusion in the treatment of cervical disk disease. To examine the mechanical effect of articulating cervical disk implants (ACDI) versus simulated cervical disk fusion, a mechanical test device was constructed and cadaveric tests were carried out. While results show little effect on the pressures above and below the treatment level, the percent hysteretic behavior of the specimens trended to be higher for the ACDI, indicating that these implants retain more of the natural energy absorption capability of the cervical spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16813439     DOI: 10.1115/1.2205373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  5 in total

1.  Subject-specific inverse dynamics of the head and cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.

Authors:  William J Anderst; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee; James D Kang
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Ranges of Cervical Intervertebral Disc Deformation During an In Vivo Dynamic Flexion-Extension of the Neck.

Authors:  Yan Yu; Haiqing Mao; Jing-Sheng Li; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Liming Cheng; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li; Thomas D Cha
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Continuous cervical spine kinematics during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.

Authors:  William J Anderst; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee; James D Kang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Specific entities affecting the craniocervical region: syndromes affecting the craniocervical junction.

Authors:  Arnold H Menezes; Timothy W Vogel
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Normal intervertebral segment rotation of the subaxial cervical spine: An in vivo study of dynamic neck motions.

Authors:  Yan Yu; Jing-Sheng Li; Tao Guo; Zhao Lang; James D Kang; Liming Cheng; Guoan Li; Thomas D Cha
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 5.191

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.