Literature DB >> 16813325

Comparative study of integrated pest management and baiting for German cockroach management in public housing.

Changlu Wang1, Gary W Bennett.   

Abstract

This study assessed the cost and effectiveness of a building-wide cockroach integrated pest management (IPM) program compared with bait alone treatment in public housing. In total, 12 buildings (66 apartments) were treated and monitored for cockroach infestations over 7 mo. The buildings were divided into two groups: bait treatment and IPM. Apartments in the bait alone group were treated with Maxforce FC Select (0.01% fipronil) during the first 12 wk and Maxforce Roach Killer Bait Gel (2.15% hydramethylnon) from 16 wk when necessary. For the IPM group, cockroaches were flushed and vacuumed at the beginning of the study; sticky traps were placed in all apartments to monitor and reduce cockroach numbers; educational materials were delivered to the residents; and Maxforce FC Select and Maxforce Roach Killer Bait Gel were applied to kill cockroaches. Two seminars were presented to the manger, and Community Service Program staff of the Gary Housing Authority to help gain tenant cooperation in the program. Effects of the treatments were monitored using sticky traps (six per apartment) at 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 29 wk after treatment. More treatments were applied during each monitoring visit when necessary. Those apartments with high levels of infestations (> or =12 cockroaches in six traps) before treatment were used to compare the IPM and bait only treatments. IPM resulted in significantly greater trap catch reduction than the bait treatment. The IPM (n=12) and bait only treatment (n=11) resulted in 100.0 and 94.6%, respectively, reduction in trap catch after 16 wk. At 29 wk, only one apartment in the IPM group had a high level (>12 cockroaches) of cockroach infestation. In contrast, five apartments in the bait treatment group had high level infestations at 29 wk based on overnight trapping counts; thus, IPM is a more sustainable method of population reduction. Sanitation levels in the IPM group significantly improved at 29 wk (n=11) compared with that at the beginning of the study. The sanitation levels in the bait treatment group remained similar throughout the experiment (n=9). The cumulative cost of IPM was significantly higher than that of the bait treatment. The median costs per apartment during 29 wk were 64.8 dollars and 35.0 dollars for the IPM and bait treatment, respectively. The median amount of bait used per apartment in the IPM and bait treatment was 45.0 and 50.0 g, respectively. The cost of the IPM group for the 29 wk service was similar to that of the bait treatment group. We expect that IPM will provide better control at similar cost compared with bait treatment beyond 29 wk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16813325     DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-99.3.879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  12 in total

1.  Home is Where the Triggers Are: Increasing Asthma Control by Improving the Home Environment.

Authors:  James Krieger
Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.349

Review 2.  Housing interventions and control of asthma-related indoor biologic agents: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  James Krieger; David E Jacobs; Peter J Ashley; Andrea Baeder; Ginger L Chew; Dorr Dearborn; H Patricia Hynes; J David Miller; Rebecca Morley; Felicia Rabito; Darryl C Zeldin
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct

Review 3.  Indoor Environmental Interventions and their Effect on Asthma Outcomes.

Authors:  Rebin Kader; Kevin Kennedy; Jay M Portnoy
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 4.806

4.  Housing Quality and Mental Health: the Association between Pest Infestation and Depressive Symptoms among Public Housing Residents.

Authors:  Snehal N Shah; Alan Fossa; Abigail S Steiner; John Kane; Jonathan I Levy; Gary Adamkiewicz; Willie Mae Bennett-Fripp; Margaret Reid
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.671

5.  Cockroach allergen reduction by cockroach control alone in low-income urban homes: a randomized control trial.

Authors:  Michelle L Sever; Samuel J Arbes; J Chad Gore; Richard G Santangelo; Ben Vaughn; Herman Mitchell; Coby Schal; Darryl C Zeldin
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 6.  Synthetic and Natural Insecticides: Gas, Liquid, Gel and Solid Formulations for Stored-Product and Food-Industry Pest Control.

Authors:  Vaclav Stejskal; Tomas Vendl; Radek Aulicky; Christos Athanassiou
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.769

7.  Survey of pest infestation, asthma, and allergy in low-income housing.

Authors:  Changlu Wang; Mahmoud M Abou El-Nour; Gary W Bennett
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2008-02

Review 8.  Insecticide Resistance and Management Strategies in Urban Ecosystems.

Authors:  Fang Zhu; Laura Lavine; Sally O'Neal; Mark Lavine; Carrie Foss; Douglas Walsh
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.769

9.  Development of Diagnostic Insecticide Concentrations and Assessment of Insecticide Susceptibility in German Cockroach (Dictyoptera: Blattellidae) Field Strains Collected From Public Housing.

Authors:  Mahsa Fardisi; Ameya D Gondhalekar; Michael E Scharf
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Factors driving public tolerance levels and information-seeking behaviour concerning insects in the household environment.

Authors:  Bruce Schoelitsz; P Marijn Poortvliet; Willem Takken
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 4.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.