Literature DB >> 16812947

Phlebotomy issues and quality improvement in results of laboratory testing.

Giuseppe Lippi1, Gian Luca Salvagno, Martina Montagnana, Massimo Franchini, Gian Cesare Guidi.   

Abstract

Laboratory testing is an integral part of the decision-making process, and results of laboratory testing often strongly influence medical diagnoses and therapies. There is a long history of quality requirements in laboratory medicine, which have mainly concerned the analytic phase of this process. Owing to the substantial advances in technology, laboratory automation and analytic quality, there is increasing evidence that further quality improvements should be targeted to extra-analytic phases of laboratory testing. Objective difficulties to monitor most of the preanalytic variables which lie outside the direct control or supervision of the laboratory personnel, such as phlebotomy, call for effective educational and preventive policies. Owing to high personnel turnover rates, lack of understanding about good laboratory practices, and inadequate training, there are several opportunities for making errors during phlebotomy, which mainly concern patient misidentification and collection of unsuitable specimens for testing due to unsuited venous accesses, venous stasis, inappropriate collection devices and containers. Improved standardization of phlebotomy techniques, along with operative guidelines dissemination, continuous education, certification, and training of health care professionals involved in blood drawing responsibilities would enhance the chance of obtaining specimens of consistent quality, with favorable revenues for the health care system and the patient's outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16812947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lab        ISSN: 1433-6510            Impact factor:   1.138


  25 in total

1.  Errors in medicine and errors in laboratory medicine: what is the difference?

Authors:  Cosimo Ottomano
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Spurious hyperglycaemia impairs automated leucocyte counting. A pilot study with two different haematological analysers.

Authors:  Ruggero Buonocore; Alessandra Picanza; Daniela Gennari; Silvia Pipitone; Giuseppe Lippi
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Readers' response and author's reply to "Laboratory results that should be ignored".

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Gian Cesare Guidi
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006

Review 4.  The Henry Ford production system: LEAN process redesign improves service in the molecular diagnostic laboratory: a paper from the 2008 William Beaumont hospital symposium on molecular pathology.

Authors:  Milena Cankovic; Ruan C Varney; Lisa Whiteley; Ron Brown; Rita D'Angelo; Dhananjay Chitale; Richard J Zarbo
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 5.  Factors affecting hemoglobin measurement.

Authors:  Lauren Berkow
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Lessons of the month 1: Learning from Harvey; improving blood-taking by pointing the needle in the right direction.

Authors:  Keith L Dorrington; Matthew C Frise
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 7.  Before you analyze a human specimen, think quality, variability, and bias.

Authors:  Mark David Lim; Anthony Dickherber; Carolyn C Compton
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 8.  Managing the pre- and post-analytical phases of the total testing process.

Authors:  Robert Hawkins
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  Findings of Phlebotomy Practices in Kenya in 2010: Need for Action.

Authors:  Daniel Kimani; Rachel Kamau; Renuka Gadde; Dejana Selenic; Stephen Maina; Lawrence Marum; Gao Hongjiang; Samuel Mwalili; Anthony Marfin; Jane Mwangi
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 10.  Biobanking past, present and future: responsibilities and benefits.

Authors:  Yvonne G De Souza; John S Greenspan
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 4.177

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.