Literature DB >> 16812591

The effect of logarithmic transformation on estimating the parameters of the generalized matching law.

C D Heth, W D Pierce, T W Belke, S A Hensch.   

Abstract

The generalized matching law was initially stated as a nonlinear relation between reinforcement-rate ratios and response-rate ratios. Often, the variables of the law are transformed logarithmically to remove the nonlinearity; empirical results are then fit to the model through least-squares regression. However, the logarithmic expression of the matching law is a biased statistical representation of the law itself. In particular, the logarithmic transformation alters the quantitative conclusions to be drawn from a least-squares regression analysis. A Monte Carlo study of the effect of transforming matching-law data demonstrated that (a) the estimates of one or both of the parameters of the generalized matching law are biased, (b) the measure of goodness of fit (R(2)) is inaccurate, and (c) predictions generated by the fitted parameters are incorrect. Alternative approaches to logarithmic transformations are shown to alleviate these problems.

Entities:  

Year:  1989        PMID: 16812591      PMCID: PMC1338945          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

1.  Distribution of response ratios in concurrent variable-interval performance.

Authors:  R D Tustin; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  How to maximize reward rate on two variable-interval paradigms.

Authors:  A I Houston; J McNamara
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the exponent in the "generalized" matching equation.

Authors:  C M Allen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  Fitting nonlinear models to data.

Authors:  R I Jennrich; M L Ralston
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng       Date:  1979

6.  Undermatching on concurrent variable-interval schedules and the power law.

Authors:  J H Wearden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Superior-subordinate dyads: Dependence of leader effectiveness on mutual reinforcement contingencies.

Authors:  R K Rao; T C Mawhinney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.