Literature DB >> 16812550

Determinants of pausing under variable-ratio schedules: Reinforcer magnitude, ratio size, and schedule configuration.

E Blakely, H Schlinger.   

Abstract

Pigeons pecked a key under two-component multiple variable-ratio schedules that offered 8-s or 2-s access to grain. Phase 1 assessed the effects of differences in reinforcer magnitude on postreinforcement pausing, as a function of ratio size. In Phase 2, postreinforcement pausing and the first five interresponse times in each ratio were measured as a function of differences in reinforcer magnitude under equal variable-ratio schedules consisting of different configurations of individual ratios. Rates were also calculated exclusive of postreinforcement pause times in both phases. The results from Phase 1 showed that as ratio size increased, the differences in pausing educed by unequal reinforcer magnitudes also increased. The results of Phase 2 showed that the effects of reinforcer magnitude on pausing and IRT durations were a function of schedule configuration. Under one configuration, in which the smallest ratio was a fixed-ratio 1, pauses were unaffected by magnitude but the first five interresponse times were affected. Under the other configuration, in which the smallest ratio was a fixed-ratio 7, pauses were affected by reinforcer magnitude but the first five interresponse times were not. The effect of each configuration seemed to be determined by the value of the smallest individual ratio. Rates calculated exclusive of postreinforcement pause times were, in general, directly related to reinforcer magnitude, and the relation was shown to be a function of schedule configuration.

Year:  1988        PMID: 16812550      PMCID: PMC1338841          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  10 in total

1.  The effect of reinforcement magnitude upon responding under fixed-ratio schedules.

Authors:  R W Powell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Effects of reinforcement magnitude on interval and ratio schedules.

Authors:  C F Lowe; G C Davey; P Harzem
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Aftereffects of reinforcement on variable-ratio schedules.

Authors:  P J Priddle-Higson; C F Lowe; P Harzem
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Steady-state performance on fixed-, mixed-, and random-ratio schedules.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Inhibiting function of reinforcement: magnitude effects on variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  P Harzem; C F Lowe; P J Priddle-Higson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects of variations in local reinforcement rate on local response rate in variable interval schedules.

Authors:  J C Leslie
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The effect of small sequential changes in fixed-ratio size upon the post-reinforcement pause.

Authors:  R W Powell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The post-reinforcement pause.

Authors:  M Felton; D O Lyon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Second-order schedules of token reinforcement with pigeons: effects of fixed- and variable-ratio exchange schedules.

Authors:  T A Foster; T D Hackenberg; M Vaidya
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Changing behavior within session: cyclicity and perseverance produced by varying the minimum ratio of a variable-ratio schedule.

Authors:  M E Andrzejewski; D P Field; P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  What 50 years of research tell us about pausing under ratio schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  Henry D Schlinger; Adam Derenne; Alan Baron
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2008

4.  Multiple determinants of the effects of reinforcement magnitude on free-operant response rates.

Authors:  P Reed
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Reinforcement magnitude and pausing on progressive-ratio schedules.

Authors:  A Baron; J Mikorski; M Schlund
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Additional-delay schedules: A continuum of temporal contingencies by varying food delay.

Authors:  K Manabe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Pausing under variable-ratio schedules: Interaction of reinforcer magnitude, variable-ratio size, and lowest ratio.

Authors:  H Schlinger; E Blakely; T Kaczor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Models of ratio schedule performance.

Authors:  L A Bizo; P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1997-07

9.  Extended pausing by humans on multiple fixed-ratio schedules with varied reinforcer magnitude and response requirements.

Authors:  Dean C Williams; Kathryn J Saunders; Michael Perone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.