Literature DB >> 16812465

An assessment of the role of handling cues in "spontaneous recovery" after extinction.

D R Thomas, L Sherman.   

Abstract

Three experiments examined the assertion that presession handling cues that accompany training with reinforcement might account for spontaneous recovery when they reoccur following extinction. In Experiment 1, after extensive training on a variable-interval schedule, key pecking in pigeons was extinguished following either normal or distinctively different handling and transportational cues. Those cues resulted in enhanced spontaneous recovery 24 hr later when normal cues were reinstated. In Experiment 2, however, subjects tested following the normal handling cues showed no more spontaneous recovery than did subjects that spent the entire extinction-test interval in the experimental chambers and thus were tested without handling cues altogether. In Experiment 3, a group whose test for recovery began 10 min after being placed in the chambers yielded as much spontaneous recovery as did a group tested normally. Furthermore, a group for which extinction began at mid-session and for which handling therefore could not be a discriminative cue for extinction showed no more spontaneous recovery than did the other two groups. Handling cues thus contributed to spontaneous recovery only after explicit discrimination training, as provided in Experiment 1.

Year:  1986        PMID: 16812465      PMCID: PMC1348269          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  5 in total

1.  Differential effects of continuous extinction and discrimination training on the generalization gradient.

Authors:  W K HONIG; D R THOMAS; N GUTTM AN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-08

2.  Acquisition, extinction, and spontaneous recovery as a function of percentage of reinforcement and intertrial intervals.

Authors:  D J LEWIS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-01

3.  Are theories of learning necessary?

Authors:  B F SKINNER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1950-07       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Inhibition and the stimulus control of operant behavior.

Authors:  E Hearst; S Besley; G W Farthing
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  Retention of reinforcer magnitude.

Authors:  N E Spear
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 8.934

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Different mechanisms of fear extinction dependent on length of time since fear acquisition.

Authors:  Karyn M Myers; Kerry J Ressler; Michael Davis
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Opposite effects of fear conditioning and extinction on dendritic spine remodelling.

Authors:  Cora Sau Wan Lai; Thomas F Franke; Wen-Biao Gan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  An extinction cue reduces spontaneous recovery of ataxic ethanol tolerance in rats.

Authors:  Douglas C Brooks; Joanne M Vaughn; Andrew J Freeman; Amanda M Woods
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 4.530

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.