Literature DB >> 16812370

Time reallocation in a multiresponse environment: Effects of restricting response classes.

C A Lyons, C D Cheney.   

Abstract

Four adult male rats were each placed for three hours daily into an apparatus that provided individual compartments for six separate location-defined responses. The available responses consisted of: (1) the opportunity to turn off room lighting, producing darkness; (2) the opportunity to view a female rat; (3) the opportunity to turn off white noise; (4) the opportunity to drink; (5) the opportunity to eat; and (6) "other," representing time in the hallway between compartments. Each subject underwent a series of conditions characterized as an A-B-A-C-A design. Manipulations consisted of the removal of a low-probability response (darkness) and of a high-probability response (escape from noise) in a counter-balanced manner across subjects. The dependent measure for all subjects was the percentage of total session time spent in each compartment. Four predictive rules concerning the redistribution of behavior after response restriction were tested, including the constant-ratio rule, equal time redistribution, the most probable alternative, and the sequential-dependency rule. The results indicate no support for any of the four predictive rules and suggest that empirical assessment of restriction effects is necessary in reinforcement studies involving temporally extended responses.

Entities:  

Year:  1984        PMID: 16812370      PMCID: PMC1348059          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  5 in total

1.  Changes in a multiple-response repertoire during response-contingent punishment and response restriction: Sequential relationships.

Authors:  P J Dunham; J Grantmyre
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Contrast, induction, facilitation, suppression, and conservation.

Authors:  J Allison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Reinforcement and substitution in humans: a multiple-response analysis.

Authors:  D J Bernstein; E B Ebbesen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 4.  The Premack Principle in human experimental and applied settings.

Authors:  T J Knapp
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1976

5.  What is the necessary and sufficient condition for reinforcement in the contingency situation?

Authors:  R Eisenberger; M Karpman; J Trattner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-07
  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Response-restriction analysis: II. Alteration of activity preferences.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Brian A Iwata; Eileen M Roscoe; Rachel H Thompson; Jana S Lindberg
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

2.  Response-restriction analysis: I. Assessment of activity preferences.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Brian A Iwata; Jana S Lindberg; Juliet Conners
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

3.  A response-restriction analysis of stereotypy in adolescents with mental retardation: implications for applied behavior analysis.

Authors:  J E McEntee; R R Saunders
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

4.  Response restriction and substitution with autistic children.

Authors:  G Green; S Striefel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.