Literature DB >> 16812316

Spatial and temporal relations in conditioned reinforcement and observing behavior.

C A Bowe, J A Dinsmoor.   

Abstract

In Experiment 1, depressing one perch produced stimuli indicating which of two keys, if pecked, could produce food (spatial information) and depressing the other perch produced stimuli indicating whether a variable-interval or an extinction schedule was operating (temporal information). The pigeons increased the time they spent depressing the perch that produced the temporal information but did not increase the time they spent depressing the perch that produced the spatial information. In Experiment 2, pigeons that were allowed to produce combined spatial and temporal information did not acquire the perch pressing any faster or maintain it at a higher level than pigeons allowed to produce only temporal information. Later, when perching produced only spatial information, the time spent depressing the perch eventually declined. The results are not those implied by the statement that information concerning biologically important events is reinforcing but are consistent with an interpretation in terms of the acquisition of reinforcing properties by a stimulus associated with a higher density of primary reinforcement.

Entities:  

Year:  1983        PMID: 16812316      PMCID: PMC1347916          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

1.  Toward a quantitative theory of secondary reinforcement.

Authors:  L B WYCKOFF
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1959-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  The acquisition of observing responses in the absence of differential external reinforcement.

Authors:  W F PROKASY
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1956-04

3.  Secondary reinforcement established with subcortical stimulation.

Authors:  L STEIN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1958-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Observing stimulus sources that signal food or no food.

Authors:  H M Jenkins; R A Boakes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A quantitative comparison of the discriminative and reinforcing functions of a stimulus.

Authors:  J A DINSMOOR
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1950-08

6.  The acquisition of observing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; K L Mueller; L T Martin; C A Bowe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  A conditioned reinforcer maintained by temporal association with the termination of shock.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; M H Clayton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Signal modality and choice between signaled and unsignaled food.

Authors:  J Harsh; P Badia; K Ryan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Information on response requirements compared with information on food density as a reinforcer of observing in pigeons.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; C A Bowe; L Green; J Hanson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Factors affecting choice of signaled or unsignaled food schedules.

Authors:  J Harsh; P Badia; K Ryan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Disruption of responding maintained by conditioned reinforcement: alterations in response-conditioned-reinforcer relations.

Authors:  Gregory A Lieving; Mark P Reilly; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Human observing: maintained by negative informative stimuli only if correlated with improvement in response efficiency.

Authors:  D A Case; E Fantino; J Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.