Literature DB >> 16812202

Differential responding without differential reinforcement: Intensity difference, continuum position, and reinforcement density effects.

T G Raslear.   

Abstract

The response rates of five groups of rats were observed during exposure to different intensities of a four kilohertz tone within a two-component multiple schedule of nondifferential reinforcement. Response rates were found to be higher during the multiple schedule component which contained the higher intensity tone. Larger differences in response rates between the two multiple schedule components occurred with greater intensity separations (30 versus 20 decibels). At the 30 decibel separation a low absolute magnitude produced larger response rate differences than a high absolute magnitude, while at the 20 decibel separation a high absolute magnitude produced larger response rate differences. Increases in reinforcement density were accompanied by decreases in response rate differences between high and low intensity components only when over-all response rates also increased.

Entities:  

Year:  1981        PMID: 16812202      PMCID: PMC1333024          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-79

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  STARTLE RESPONSE: HABITUATION OVER TRIALS AND DAYS, AND SEX AND STRAIN DIFFERENCES.

Authors:  K E MOYER
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1963-10

Review 2.  STIMULUS INTENSITY DYNAMISM.

Authors:  J A GRAY
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE RATES CORRELATED WITH THE PRESENCE OF "NEUTRAL" STIMULI.

Authors:  J D KIEFFER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Discrimination learning as a function of stimulus location along an auditory intensity continuum.

Authors:  S Sadowsky
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Acoustic and temporal factors in the evocation of startle.

Authors:  H S Hoffman; J L Searle
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory discrimination: a three-variable analysis of intensity effects.

Authors:  R Pierrel; J G Sherman; S Blue; F W Hegge
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Adequate acoustic stimulus for startle reaction in the rat.

Authors:  M Fleshler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1965-10

8.  Differential responding as a function of auditory stimulus intensity without differential reinforcement.

Authors:  S Blue; J G Sherman; R Pierrel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Inverse relationship between discriminability and stimulus generalization as a function of number of test stimuli.

Authors:  G D Marsh
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1967-10

10.  Loudness scaling in rats and chinchillas.

Authors:  R Pierrel-Sorrentino; T G Raslear
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1980-08
View more
  1 in total

1.  Analysis of discriminative control by social behavioral stimuli.

Authors:  D F Hake; T Donaldson; C Hyten
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.