Literature DB >> 16812109

Avoidance based on shock intensity reduction with no change in shock probability.

P J Bersh, L B Alloy.   

Abstract

Rats were trained on a free-operant avoidance procedure in which shock intensity was controlled by interresponse time. Shocks were random at a density of about 10 shocks per minute. Shock probability was response independent. As long as interresponse times remained less than the limit in effect, any shocks received were at the lower of two intensities (0.75 mA). Whenever interresponse times exceeded the limit, any shocks received were at the higher intensity (1.6 mA). The initial limit of 15 seconds was decreased in 3-second steps to either 6 or 3 seconds. All animals lever pressed to avoid higher intensity shock. As the interresponse time limit was reduced, the response rate during the lower intensity shock and the proportion of brief interresponse times increased. Substantial warmup effects were evident, particularly at the shorter interresponse-time limits. Shock intensity reduction without change in shock probability was effective in the acquisition and maintenance of avoidance responding, as well as in differentiation of interresponse times. This research suggests limitations on the generality of a safety signal interpretation of avoidance conditioning.

Entities:  

Year:  1978        PMID: 16812109      PMCID: PMC1332773          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  10 in total

1.  The role of temporal discriminations in the reinforcement of Sidman avoidance behavior.

Authors:  D ANGER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  CHARACTERISTICS OF AVERSIVE THRESHOLDS MEASURED BY A TITRATION SCHEDULE.

Authors:  B WEISS; V G LATIES
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Titration behavior on various fractional escape programs.

Authors:  B WEISS; V G LATIES
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Escape learning as a function of amount of shock reduction.

Authors:  G H BOWER; H FOWLER; M A TRAPOLD
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-12

5.  The reinforcement difference limen (RDL) function for shock reduction.

Authors:  B A CAMPBELL
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-10

6.  Response strength as a function of drive level and amount of drive reduction.

Authors:  B A CAMPBELL; D KRAELING
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-02

7.  Avoidance conditioning with brief shock and no exteroceptive warning signal.

Authors:  M SIDMAN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1953-08-07       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Escape, avoidance, punishment: where do we stand?

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The discriminative control of free-operant avoidance despite exposure to shock during the stimulus correlated with nonreinforcement.

Authors:  P J Bersh; J V Lambert
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Persistent shock-elicited responding engendered by a negative-reinforcement procedure.

Authors:  R W Powell; S Peck
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  10 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Stimuli inevitably generated by behavior that avoids electric shock are inherently reinforcing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Duration-reduction of avoidance sessions as negative reinforcement.

Authors:  M Mellitz; P N Hineline; W G Whitehouse; M T Laurence
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Reduction of shock duration as negative reinforcement in free-operant avoidance.

Authors:  P J Bersh; L B Alloy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Avoidance as expectancy in rats: sex and strain differences in acquisition.

Authors:  Pelin Avcu; Xilu Jiao; Catherine E Myers; Kevin D Beck; Kevin C H Pang; Richard J Servatius
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 3.558

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.