Literature DB >> 16811861

Two-component schedules of differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate.

P Harzem, C F Lowe, G C Davey.   

Abstract

Two-component schedules of differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate were presented, where the contingencies specified separately two minimum interresponse times, t(1) and t(2), required for reinforcement, depending on whether the interresponse time was initiated by, in one case, a reinforced response (t(1)) or, in the other, a nonreinforced response (t(2)). A distinctive pattern of responding developed on each of the two contingencies. Duration of an interresponse time approximated t(1) when the t(1) contingency was in effect, and t(2) when the t(2) contingency was in effect. This relationship persisted even when t(2) was shorter than t(1), and responding at a higher rate on the t(1) contingency would have greatly increased the rate of reinforcement. Increasing the value of t(2) resulted in both longer interresponse times on the t(1) contingency, and a higher probability of a response-burst on those occasions when the contingency switched from t(1) to t(2). The results indicated that both reinforced and nonreinforced responses functioned as discriminative events in determining the duration of following interresponse times.

Year:  1975        PMID: 16811861      PMCID: PMC1333378          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  18 in total

1.  STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND THE RESPONSE-REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY.

Authors:  E HEARST; M B KORESKO; R POPPEN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  EFFECTS OF A DRL CONTINGENCY ADDED TO A FIXED-INTERVAL REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE.

Authors:  J FARMER; W N SCHOENFELD
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  SOME PROPERTIES OF SPACED RESPONDING IN PIGEONS.

Authors:  J E STADDON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  SEQUENTIAL RESPONSE EFFECTS IN THE WHITE RAT DURING CONDITIONING AND EXTINCTION ON A DRL SCHEDULE.

Authors:  D P FERRARO; W N SCHOENFELD; A G SNAPPER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Spaced responding in multiple DRL schedules.

Authors:  J ZIMMERMAN; C R SCHUSTER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Inter-response time distribution as a function of differential reinforcement of temporally spaced responses.

Authors:  R T KELLEHER; W FRY; L COOK
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects of reinforcement magnitude on interval and ratio schedules.

Authors:  C F Lowe; G C Davey; P Harzem
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A response-initiated fixed-interval schedule of reinforcement.

Authors:  R L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effects of withheld reinforcement on timing behavior of rats with limbic lesions.

Authors:  M Caplan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1970-04

10.  Magnitude and frequency of reinforcement and frequencies of interresponse times.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  Memory for recent behavior in the pigeon.

Authors:  S P Kramer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Temporal control of behavior: schedule interactions.

Authors:  P Harzem; C F Lowe; P T Spencer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Species differences in temporal control of behavior.

Authors:  C F Lowe; P Harzem
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.