Literature DB >> 16811854

On the minimal conditions for the development of a peak-shift and inhibitory stimulus control.

A P Rosen, H S Terrace.   

Abstract

Failures to obtain a peak-shift and inhibitory stimulus control following massed extinction in the presence of intra- and interdimensional stimuli confirm earlier results reported by Honig, Thomas, and Guttman (1959) and by Weisman and Palmer (1969). Peak-shifts and inhibitory stimulus control were observed when any of the following procedures intervened for 3 min between massed extinction and generalization testing: (1) S+ presented, responding reinforced; (2) S+ presented, responding not reinforced; or, (3) noncontingent food presented in the presence of a dark key. Behavioral contrast was shown not to be a necessary antecedent for the occurrence of peak-shift or inhibitory stimulus control.

Year:  1975        PMID: 16811854      PMCID: PMC1333365          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  18 in total

1.  Frustrative nonreward in partial reinforcement and discrimination learning: some recent history and a theoretical extension.

Authors:  A AMSEL
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1962-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  H M HANSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

3.  Differential effects of continuous extinction and discrimination training on the generalization gradient.

Authors:  W K HONIG; D R THOMAS; N GUTTM AN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-08

4.  Behavioral contrast and inhibitory stimulus control as related to extended training.

Authors:  W Selekman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Extinction of a discriminative operant following discrimination learning with and without errors.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Discrimination learning, the peak shift, and behavioral contrast.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  On the nature of non-responding in discrimination learning with and without errors.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Factors influencing inhibitory stimulus control: discrimination training and prior non-differential reinforcement.

Authors:  R G Weisman; J A Palmer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Inhibition and the stimulus control of operant behavior.

Authors:  E Hearst; S Besley; G W Farthing
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Discrimination learning and inhibition.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-12-30       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  2 in total

1.  The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): Twenty-five years of research on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  W K Honig; P J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Rescaling of temporal expectations during extinction.

Authors:  Michael R Drew; Carolyn Walsh; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.478

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.