Literature DB >> 16811846

Concurrent assessment of schedule and intensity control across successive discriminations.

T G Raslear, R Pierrel-Sorrentino, C Brissey.   

Abstract

Two chinchillas were trained on a series of two-valued auditory intensity discriminations. Lever presses were reinforced when no tone was present and not reinforced in the presence of a four-kiloHertz tone. The intensity of the nonreinforced tone was successively decreased, increasing the difficulty of the discrimination, until differential responding resembled that on a mixed schedule (no-tone-no-tone). Response data were partitioned in such a way as to provide a continuing assessment of the relative amounts of control exerted by the reinforcement schedule and the sound intensity, respectively. Control by reinforcement density was a direct function of discrimination difficulty, whereas the control exerted by intensity was inversely related to difficulty. For these chinchillas, the absolute threshold value obtained at four kiloHertz was about two decibels referenced to 20 microNewtons per meter squared.

Entities:  

Year:  1975        PMID: 16811846      PMCID: PMC1333346          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  6 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Discriminative responding on associated mixed and multiple schedules as a function of food and ICS reinforcement.

Authors:  S Sadowsky
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Auditory discrimination: a three-variable analysis of intensity effects.

Authors:  R Pierrel; J G Sherman; S Blue; F W Hegge
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Audibility curve of the chinchilla.

Authors:  J D Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Measurement of stimulus control during discriminative operant conditioning.

Authors:  H M Jenkins
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Antecedent reinforcement contingencies in the stimulus control of an auditory discrimination.

Authors:  R Pierrel; S Blue
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Auditory word discriminations in the pigeon.

Authors:  R Pisacreta; D Gough; E Redwood; L Goodfellow
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.