Literature DB >> 16811836

Inhibitory control and errorless discrimination learning.

J Karpicke, E Hearst.   

Abstract

Pigeons learned to discriminate between a positive stimulus (white key) and a negative stimulus (red or green key, depending on the subject) via Terrace's fading procedure. Generalization tests, conducted with intermittent reinforcement for key pecking at various wavelengths, yielded minima at the value of the negative stimulus in most "errorless" birds. Terrace's contrary finding of flat gradients in errorless subjects probably resulted from a floor-effect (i.e., virtually zero responding) produced by his extinction-test procedure. The present and other findings do not support Terrace's conclusions that the negative stimulus of an errorless discrimination is behaviorally neutral; inhibition apparently develops to the nonreinforced stimulus even during errorless discrimination learning. A negative correlation between stimulus and reinforcer seems the crucial factor in producing an inhibitory stimulus.

Entities:  

Year:  1975        PMID: 16811836      PMCID: PMC1333336          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  6 in total

1.  Errorless discrimination established by differential autoshaping.

Authors:  D M Wilkie; D G Ramer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Inhibition and the stimulus control of operant behavior.

Authors:  E Hearst; S Besley; G W Farthing
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Errorless discrimination, autoshaping, and conditioned inhibition.

Authors:  M G Wessells
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-11-30       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Stimulus generalization as a function of discrimination learning with and without errors.

Authors:  J Lyons
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Discrimination learning and inhibition.

Authors:  J A Deutsch; H S Terrace
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-05-19       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Discrimination learning and inhibition.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-12-30       Impact factor: 47.728

  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): Twenty-five years of research on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  W K Honig; P J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Reinforcement of probe responses and acquisition of stimulus control in fading procedures.

Authors:  L Fields
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Transfer of discriminative control during stimulus fading conducted without reinforcement.

Authors:  Lanny Fields
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Attention in the pigeon: testing for excitatory and inhibitory control by the weak elements.

Authors:  S B Kendall; W A Mills
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  The role of observing and attention in establishing stimulus control.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Conditional discrimination after errorless and trial-and-error training.

Authors:  G L Schilmoeller; K J Schilmoeller; B C Etzel; J M LeBlanc
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.