Literature DB >> 16811794

Time limits for completing fixed ratios. III. Stimulus variables.

A J Decasper, M D Zeiler.   

Abstract

Pigeons received food only if they took longer than a specified time to begin and complete a fixed ratio. In Experiment 1, ratios with shorter durations had no stimulus consequence; in Experiment 2, these ratios ended with a stimulus change. In both studies, the mean time to complete the ratio exceeded requirements of less than 30 sec, approximately matched requirements of 30 sec, and fell progressively short of matching thereafter. Variability increased together with the means. The various effects resembled those of temporal differentiation experiments involving single responses. Although both number of ratios and time separating successive food presentations increased along with ratio duration, control experiments showed that differential reinforcement of duration, rather than either form or reinforcer intermittency, accounted for the performance. Experiment 2 also studied the effects of adding a stimulus that signalled when the required time had elapsed. The stimulus produced durations that matched even the most stringent requirements. This precision was not maintained when the stimulus was removed. Temporal differentiation schedules seem to have similar effects regardless of the response class and temporal property involved.

Year:  1974        PMID: 16811794      PMCID: PMC1333270          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  ADJUSTING FIXED-RATIO SCHEDULES IN THE SQUIRREL MONKEY.

Authors:  R T KELLEHER; W FRY; L COOK
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  SOME PROPERTIES OF SPACED RESPONDING IN PIGEONS.

Authors:  J E STADDON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Inter-response time distribution as a function of differential reinforcement of temporally spaced responses.

Authors:  R T KELLEHER; W FRY; L COOK
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Discrete-trials DRL.

Authors:  F A LOGAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A test of the effectiveness of the differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule.

Authors:  W K Richardson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reinforcement contingencies maintaining collateral responding under a DRL schedule.

Authors:  D E McMillan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  On some causes of behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S Reynolds; A J Limpo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Discrimination and emission of temporal intervals by pigeons.

Authors:  G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Conditioned reinforcement in second-order schedules.

Authors:  R T Kelleher
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Rats' lever-press durations as psychophysical judgements of time.

Authors:  J R Platt; D O Kuch; S C Bitgood
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  8 in total

1.  Concurrent schedules: a quantitative relation between changeover behavior and its consequences.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff; H M Reid
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Time limits for completing fixed ratios. IV. Components of the ratio.

Authors:  A J Decasper; M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Species differences in temporal control of behavior.

Authors:  C F Lowe; P Harzem
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Temporal reproduction.

Authors:  M D Zeiler; M S Hoyert
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Sequences of spaced responses: Behavioral units and the role of contiguity.

Authors:  S M Schneider; E K Morris
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice between response units: The rate constancy model.

Authors:  M D Zeiler; T F Blakely
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Temporal control of behavior and the power law.

Authors:  C F Lowe; P Harzem; P T Spencer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Undermatching on concurrent variable-interval schedules and the power law.

Authors:  J H Wearden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.