Literature DB >> 16811658

Maintaining responding during stimulus generalization testing in extinction.

K Malott, R W Malott, M F Glenn.   

Abstract

Resistance to extinction and generalization gradients were studied following training with a long-adjusting-interval schedule. One large reinforcer occurred at the end of each daily training session. Sessions varied in length from 20 sec to 42.66 min, but were usually the latter. Repeated generalization tests were subsequently conducted for these subjects and subjects trained with a more conventional short-random-interval schedule. The long-adjusting-interval schedule produced generalization gradients that were not qualitatively different from those produced by the conventional procedure. However, the advantages of the long-adjusting-interval schedule are: (1) greater resistance to extinction both within and across generalization tests and (2) more stable gradient slopes within and across tests.

Year:  1973        PMID: 16811658      PMCID: PMC1334071          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  5 in total

1.  PROPERTIES OF BEHAVIOR UNDER RANDOM INTERVAL REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES.

Authors:  J FARMER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Stimulus generalization following different methods of training.

Authors:  D B REINHOLD; C C PERKINS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1955-06

3.  Discriminability and stimulus generalization.

Authors:  N GUTTMAN; H I KALISH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-01

4.  A generalization gradient for auditory intensity in the rat.

Authors:  R Pierrel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-10       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Generalization and response mediation of a conditional discrimination.

Authors:  D A Eckerman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.