Literature DB >> 16811605

Two temporal parameters of food postponement.

J B Smith, F C Clark.   

Abstract

Rats were trained to press a lever under schedules of food postponement. In the absence of lever presses, food was delivered periodically (food-food interval). Responses initiated a second interval (response-food interval) that was reset by each additional response. Performance was first studied at different response-food intervals with the food-food interval fixed at 30 or 60 sec, or 10 min. Response-food intervals were examined in ascending order and then recovery was studied at shorter intervals. Finally, the food-food interval was manipulated with response-food interval fixed at 30 sec. At food-food intervals of 30 and 60 sec, responding first increased and then decreased as the response-food interval increased. At the 10-min food-food interval, responding decreased with increasing response-food interval. In general, very low rates of responding occurred when the response-food interval was 60 sec or more and when it equalled or exceeded the food-food interval. However, responding was maintained in one animal when the food-food interval was decreased from 120 to 15 sec with the response-food interval at 30 sec. Results, in terms of several dependent variables, are compared with data on shock avoidance. Effects of response-independent and response-produced food and shock are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  1972        PMID: 16811605      PMCID: PMC1333979          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  15 in total

1.  Some effects of response-independent positive reinforcement on maintained operant behavior.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN; W H MORSE
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1957-10

2.  Avoidance conditioning as a factor in the effects of unavoidable shocks on food-reinforced behavior.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN; M SIDMAN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1958-06

3.  Punishment. I. The avoidance hypothesis.

Authors:  J A DINSMOOR
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1954-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Two temporal parameters of the maintenance of avoidance behavior by the white rat.

Authors:  M SIDMAN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1953-08

5.  Avoidance conditioning with brief shock and no exteroceptive warning signal.

Authors:  M SIDMAN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1953-08-07       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Responding under fixed-ratio and multiple fixed-interval fixed-ratio schedules of electric shock presentation.

Authors:  J W McKearney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 7.  Determinants of the specificity of behavioral effects of drugs.

Authors:  R T Kelleher; W H Morse
Journal:  Ergeb Physiol       Date:  1968

8.  Fixed and variable schedules of response-independent reinforcement.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Negative reinforcement as shock-frequency reduction.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Free operant avoidance as a function of the response-shock = shock-shock interval.

Authors:  F C Clark; L D Hull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effects of response rate, reinforcement frequency, and the duration of a stimulus preceding response-independent food.

Authors:  J B Smith
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Schedules of food postponement: II. Maintenance of behavior by food postponement and effects of the schedule parameter.

Authors:  F C Clark; J B Smith
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Preference for less frequent shock under fixed-interval schedules of electric-shock presentation.

Authors:  R C Pitts; E F Malagodi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Maintenance of responding by squirrel monkeys under a concurrent shock-postponement, fixed-interval shock-presentation schedule.

Authors:  J E Barrett; J A Stanley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Some determinants of the reinforcing and punishing effects of timeout.

Authors:  J V Solnick; A Rincover; C R Peterson
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1977
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.