Literature DB >> 16811439

Some punishing effects of response-force.

L K Miller.   

Abstract

The present experiment explored the punishing effect of different response-force requirements by means of a two-operant design analogous to a two-component chain schedule. The first component of the chain required a lever pull through 0.25 in. (0.64 cm) at 1 lb (4.45 N) of force. The second component required a lever pull through an additional 0.75 in. (1.90 cm) with the force varied between sessions from 1 lb to 50 lb (4.45 N to 223 N). Completion of the second component of the chain was reinforced after variable intervals averaging 1 min. The average rate of first-component response decreased as the force requirement for second-component responses was increased. This rate reduction did not appear to be due to increased response duration, "fatigue", or differing rates of reinforcement. If the force requirement for the second-component response is viewed as a consequence for the first-component response, then the results of the experiment show that a high force requirement is a punisher.

Year:  1970        PMID: 16811439      PMCID: PMC1333765          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  6 in total

1.  EFFECTS OF EFFORT ON RESPONSE RATE.

Authors:  S H CHUNG
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Response speed, amplitude, and resistance to extinction as joint functions of work and length of behavior chain.

Authors:  R F WEISS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1961-03

3.  The effect of effort upon extinction.

Authors:  J CAPEHART; W VINEY; I M HULICKA
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1958-08

4.  Effort and resistance to extinction of the bar-pressing response.

Authors:  J L MAATSCH; H M ADELMAN; M R DENNY
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1954-02

5.  Response potential as a function of effort.

Authors:  M H APPLEZWEIG
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1951-06

6.  An experimental investigation of reactive inhibition and conditioned inhibition.

Authors:  K C MONTGOMERY
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1951-01
  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  Determinants of reinforcer accumulation during an operant task.

Authors:  J M McFarland; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The place of the human subject in the operant laboratory.

Authors:  A Baron; M Perone
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1982

3.  Making life easier with effort: Basic findings and applied research on response effort.

Authors:  P C Friman
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1995

4.  Discrimination theory of rule-governed behavior.

Authors:  D T Cerutti
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Correlation between self-reported rigidity and rule-governed insensitivity to operant contingencies.

Authors:  E Wulfert
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

6.  The costs of eating: a behavioral economic analysis of food refusal.

Authors:  M E Kerwin; W H Ahearn; P S Eicher; D M Burd
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1995
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.