Literature DB >> 16811272

Additional techniques for producing multiple-schedule control in children.

E R Long.   

Abstract

The subjects in these experiments were 132 children, varying in age from 4 to 7 years. These experiments were designed to assess the efficacy of various multiple scheduling procedures in producing reliable stimulus control. The schedules studied were multiple fixed-ratio-extinction (mult FR EXT); multiple differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior-fixed-ratio (mult DRO FR); multiple differential-reinforcement-for-low-rate-fixed-ratio (mult DRL FR); and multiple fixed-interval-fixed-ratio (mult FI FR). In addition other techniques were investigated, such as presenting FR's in blocks; increasing the size of the FR's; attaching a DRL to the FI members; temporarily shifting to new schedules; and adding an external clock to the FI's. These experiments yielded the following results.1.) Strong stimulus control was produced by mult FR EXT, mult DRO FR, and mult DRL FR schedules. Control for mult FR EXT was mediated principally by the individual stimuli, though on occasion it was dependent in part on the change of stimuli. The mult DRO FR was found to be highly useful for those children who had very high initial rates or who were generally uncooperative and unmanageable.2.) Contrary to a previous finding, some subjects were brought under stimulus control by means of mult FI FR schedules without the aid of additional procedures. Most, however, were not. Additional techniques found to augment the development of mult FI FR control included: (1) presenting FR's in blocks; (2) increasing the size of the FR's; (3) attaching a DRL to the FI component for a time and later removing it; and (4) shifting to a mult DRL FR, developing control, and then returning to the original mult FI FR.3.) Addition of an external clock to the FI components of the mult FI FR had several effects. Strongest control, including well-developed acceleratory patterns during the FI's, was developed in those subjects who had first been shifted from a regular mult FI FR to a mult FR EXT, brought under control, and then returned to the mult FI FR with the clock added. The added clock also produced strong control if it was present when the subject was first begun on a mult FI FR schedule. In some cases, the addition of the clock produced control in subjects who had not been controlled previously by the regular mult FI FR, but these were always subjects who had high rates. The addition of the clock first lowered the rate, then produced control.

Entities:  

Year:  1962        PMID: 16811272      PMCID: PMC1404190          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  4 in total

1.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Single and multiple schedules of reinforcement in developmentally retarded children.

Authors:  R ORLANDO; S W BIJOU
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Rapid development of multiple-schedule performances with retarded children.

Authors:  S W Bijou; R Orlando
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Intermittent reinforcement of operant behavior in children.

Authors:  E R Long; J T Hammack; F May; B J Campbell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-10       Impact factor: 2.468

  4 in total
  11 in total

1.  A half century of scalloping in the work habits of the United States Congress.

Authors:  Thomas S Critchfield; Rebecca Haley; Benjamin Sabo; Jorie Colbert; Georgette Macropoulis
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

2.  The fixed-interval scallop in human affairs.

Authors:  R Poppen
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1982

3.  Handwriting as an operant.

Authors:  F A Gonzalez; M B Waller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Effects of instructions and reinforcement-feedback on human operant behavior maintained by fixed-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  A Baron; A Kaufman; K A Stauber
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Performance of children under a multiple random-ratio random-interval schedule of reinforcement.

Authors:  G A Baxter; H Schlinger
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Clock control of human performance on avoidance and fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  A Baron; M Galizio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Controlling human fixed-interval performance.

Authors:  H Weiner
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Chained and tandem scheduling with children.

Authors:  E R Long
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effects of a concurrent task on fixed-interval responding in humans.

Authors:  V G Laties; B Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Reinforcement schedule thinning following treatment with functional communication training.

Authors:  G P Hanley; B A Iwata; R H Thompson
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.