Literature DB >> 16810752

A pilot randomized control study to evaluate endoscopic resection using a ligation device for rectal carcinoid tumors.

Hiroyuki Sakata1, Ryuichi Iwakiri, Akifumi Ootani, Seiji Tsunada, Shinichi Ogata, Hibiki Ootani, Ryo Shimoda, Kanako Yamaguchi, Yasuhisa Sakata, Sadahiro Amemori, Kotaro Mannen, Masanobu Mizuguchi, Kazuma Fujimoto.   

Abstract

AIM: Rectal carcinoid tumors smaller than 10 mm can be resected with local excision using endoscopy. In order to remove rectal carcinoid tumors completely, we evaluated endoscopic mucosal resection with a ligation device in this pilot control randomized study.
METHODS: Fifteen patients were diagnosed with rectal carcinoid tumor (less than 10 mm) in our hospital from 1993 to 2002. There were 9 males and 6 females, with a mean age 61.5 years (range, 34-77 years). The patients had no complaints of carcinoid syndrome symptoms. Fifteen patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: 7 carcinoid tumors were treated by conventional endoscopic resection, and 8 carcinoid tumors were treated by endoscopic resection using a ligation device.
RESULTS: All rectal carcinoid tumors were located at the middle to distal rectum. The size of the tumors varied from 3 mm to 10 mm and background characteristics of the patients were not different in the two groups. The rate of complete removal of carcinoid tumors using a ligation device (100%, 8/8) was significantly higher than that of conventional endoscopic resection (57.1%, 4/7). The three patients had tumor involvement of deep margin, for which additional treatment was performed. No complications occurred during or after endoscopic resection using a ligation device. All patients in the both groups were alive during the 3-year observation period.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic resection using a ligation device is a useful and safe method for resection of small rectal carcinoid tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16810752      PMCID: PMC4087714          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i25.4026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  11 in total

1.  "Band-snare" resection of small rectal carcinoid tumors.

Authors:  C Berkelhammer; I Jasper; E Kirvaitis; S Schreiber; J Hamilton; J Walloch
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  CARCINOID TUMORS OF THE RECTUM.

Authors:  V T CALDAROLA; R J JACKMAN; C G MOERTEL; M B DOCKERTY
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1964-06       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal submucosal lesions: a comparison between strip biopsy and aspiration lumpectomy.

Authors:  T Kajiyama; K Hajiro; M Sakai; K Inoue; Y Konishi; H Takakuwa; S Ueda; M Okuma
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Carcinoid tumors of the rectum: Experience with 38 cases.

Authors:  O M Grablowsky; J M Ribaudo; J E Ray
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1974 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Clinical efficacy of video-assisted gasless transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for rectal carcinoid tumor.

Authors:  Y Araki; H Isomoto; K Shirouzu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Endoscopic submucosal resection of rectal carcinoid tumors with a ligation device.

Authors:  Akiko Ono; Takahiro Fujii; Yutaka Saito; Takahisa Matsuda; Daniel T y Lee; Takuji Gotoda; Daizo Saito
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Carcinoid tumors of the rectum: effect of size, histopathology, and surgical treatment on metastasis free survival.

Authors:  A N Koura; G G Giacco; S A Curley; J M Skibber; B W Feig; L M Ellis
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Carcinoids of the rectum: an evaluation of 1271 reported cases.

Authors:  J Soga
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.540

9.  Small, polypoid-appearing carcinoid tumors of the rectum: clinicopathologic study of 16 cases and effectiveness of endoscopic treatment.

Authors:  K Matsui; T Iwase; M Kitagawa
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Treatment of gastric tumors by endoscopic mucosal resection with a ligating device.

Authors:  Y Suzuki; H Hiraishi; K Kanke; H Watanabe; N Ueno; M Ishida; H Masuyama; A Terano
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  8 in total

1.  Successful outcomes of EMR-L with 3D-EUS for rectal carcinoids compared with historical controls.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Abe; Tadayoshi Kakemura; Sumio Fujinuma; Iruru Maetani
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Which endoscopic treatment is the best for small rectal carcinoid tumors?

Authors:  Hyun Ho Choi; Jin Su Kim; Dae Young Cheung; Young-Seok Cho
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-10-16

3.  Circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection provides comparable clinical outcomes to submucosal dissection for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the rectum.

Authors:  Dae Young Cheung; Soo Kyoung Choi; Hyung-Keun Kim; Sung Soo Kim; Hiun-Suk Chae; Kyung Jin Seo; Young-Seok Cho
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Treatment for gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin A Walter; Cédric Nesti; Marko Spanjol; Attila Kollár; Lukas Bütikofer; Viktoria L Gloy; Rebecca A Dumont; Christian A Seiler; Emanuel R Christ; Piotr Radojewski; Matthias Briel; Reto M Kaderli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-25

Review 5.  Perspective on the practical indications of endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal neoplasms.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Evaluation of treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumors sized under 20 mm in comparison with the WHO 2010 guidelines.

Authors:  Nobuhisa Matsuhashi; Takao Takahashi; Hiroyuki Tomita; Hiroshi Araki; Takashi Ibuka; Kaori Tanaka; Toshiyuki Tanahashi; Satoshi Matsui; Yoshiyuki Sasaki; Yoshihiro Tanaka; Naoki Okumura; Kazuya Yamaguchi; Shinji Osada; Kazuhiro Yoshida
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-07-18

7.  Therapeutic Options for Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Reto M Kaderli; Marko Spanjol; Attila Kollár; Lukas Bütikofer; Viktoria Gloy; Rebecca A Dumont; Christian A Seiler; Emanuel R Christ; Piotr Radojewski; Matthias Briel; Martin A Walter
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 8.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Shinji Tanaka; Yusuke Saitoh; Takahisa Matsuda; Masahiro Igarashi; Takayuki Matsumoto; Yasushi Iwao; Yasumoto Suzuki; Ryoichi Nozaki; Tamotsu Sugai; Shiro Oka; Michio Itabashi; Ken-Ichi Sugihara; Osamu Tsuruta; Ichiro Hirata; Hiroshi Nishida; Hiroto Miwa; Nobuyuki Enomoto; Tooru Shimosegawa; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 7.527

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.