Literature DB >> 16810751

Predicting utility of a model for end stage liver disease in alcoholic liver disease.

Aspasia S Soultati1, Spyridon P Dourakis, Alexandra Alexopoulou, Melanie Deutsch, Larissa Vasilieva, Athanasios J Archimandritis.   

Abstract

AIM: To validate the statistic utility of both the Maddrey Discriminant Function score and the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease as predictors of short term (30 d and 90 d) mortality in patients with alcoholic hepatitis and to assess prognostic factors among clinical characteristics and laboratory variables of patients with alcoholic hepatitis.
METHODS: Thirty-four patients with the diagnosis of alcoholic hepatitis admitted to Hippokration University Hospital of Athens from 2000 to 2005 were assessed in the current retrospective study and a statistical analysis was conducted.
RESULTS: 30- and 90-d mortality rates were reported at 5.9% (2/34) and 14.7% (5/34), respectively. Significant correlation was demonstrated for the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (P30 = 0.094, P90 = 0.046) and the Maddrey Discriminant Function score (P30 = 0.033, P90 = 0.038) with 30- and 90-d mortality whereas a significant association was also established for alanine aminotransferase (P = 0.057), fibrin degradation products (P = 0.048) and C-reactive protein (P = 0.067) with 90-d mortality. For 30-d mortality the Area Under the Curve was 0.969 (95%CI: 0.902-1.036, P = 0.028) for the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score and 0.984 (95%CI: 0.942-1.027, P = 0.023) for the Maddrey Discriminant Function score with the optimal cut off point of 30.5 (sensitivity 1, specificity 0.937) and 108.68 (sensitivity 1, specificity 0.969), respectively. Accordingly, for 90-d mortality the Area Under the Curve was 0.762 (95%CI: 0.559-0.965, P = 0.065) for the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score and 0.752 (95%CI: 0.465-1.038, P = 0.076) for the Maddrey Discriminant Function score with the optimal cut off point of 19 (sensitivity 0.6, specificity 0.6) and 92 (sensitivity 0.6, specificity 0.946), respectively. The observed Kaplan Meier survival rates for different score-categories were compared with log-rank tests and higher score values were correlated with a lower survival.
CONCLUSION: Equivalency of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and the Maddrey Discriminant Function score is implied by the current study, verified by the plotted Receiver Operative Curves and the estimated survival rates. A statistically significant utility of C-reactive protein, fibrin degradation products and alanine aminotransferase as independent predictors of 90-d mortality has also been verified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16810751      PMCID: PMC4087713          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i25.4020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  14 in total

1.  Predicting the prognosis of chronic liver disease: an evolution from child to MELD. Mayo End-stage Liver Disease.

Authors:  L M Forman; M R Lucey
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  Corticosteroids improve short-term survival in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis (AH): individual data analysis of the last three randomized placebo controlled double blind trials of corticosteroids in severe AH.

Authors:  Philippe Mathurin; Charles L Mendenhall; Robert L Carithers; Marie-Jose Ramond; Willis C Maddrey; Peter Garstide; Bernard Rueff; Sylvie Naveau; Jean-Claude Chaput; Thierry Poynard
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 25.083

3.  A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts.

Authors:  M Malinchoc; P S Kamath; F D Gordon; C J Peine; J Rank; P C ter Borg
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Corticosteroid therapy of alcoholic hepatitis.

Authors:  W C Maddrey; J K Boitnott; M S Bedine; F L Weber; E Mezey; R I White
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices.

Authors:  R N Pugh; I M Murray-Lyon; J L Dawson; M C Pietroni; R Williams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  MELD score is a better prognostic model than Child-Turcotte-Pugh score or Discriminant Function score in patients with alcoholic hepatitis.

Authors:  Wichit Srikureja; Namgyal L Kyulo; Bruce A Runyon; Ke-Qin Hu
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 25.083

7.  What do we mean by validating a prognostic model?

Authors:  D G Altman; P Royston
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-02-29       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 8.  Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of alcoholic liver disease.

Authors:  K V Menon; G J Gores; V H Shah
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Prognostic factors in alcoholic liver disease. VA Cooperative Study Group.

Authors:  A Chedid; C L Mendenhall; P Gartside; S W French; T Chen; L Rabin
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Utility of the Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score in assessing prognosis of patients with alcoholic hepatitis.

Authors:  Milan Sheth; Mark Riggs; Tushar Patel
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  9 in total

1.  Predictors of 90-day mortality in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis: Experience with 183 patients at a tertiary care center from India.

Authors:  Ravi Daswani; Ashish Kumar; Shrihari Anil Anikhindi; Praveen Sharma; Vikas Singla; Naresh Bansal; Anil Arora
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-04-28

2.  Assessment of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) Score in Predicting Prognosis of Patients with Alcoholic Hepatitis.

Authors:  Sundeep K Goyal; Vinod K Dixit; Ashok K Jain; Pradeep K Mohapatra; Jayant K Ghosh
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2014-02-27

3.  Pharmacologic Treatment of Alcoholic Hepatitis: Examining Outcomes Based on Disease Severity Stratification.

Authors:  Ryan E Owens; Heather S Snyder; Jennifer D Twilla; Sanjaya K Satapathy
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2016-07-18

4.  Practical Concerns and Controversies in the Management of Alcoholic Hepatitis.

Authors:  Gene Y Im; Michael R Lucey
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2016-08

5.  UEG Week 2020 Poster Presentations.

Authors: 
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.623

6.  Prognostic models for alcoholic hepatitis.

Authors:  Erik Rahimi; Jen-Jung Pan
Journal:  Biomark Res       Date:  2015-07-21

7.  Alkaline phosphatase: the next independent predictor of the poor 90-day outcome in alcoholic hepatitis.

Authors:  Beata Kasztelan-Szczerbinska; Maria Slomka; Krzysztof Celinski; Mariusz Szczerbinski
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Risk Prediction of Nosocomial and Posthospital Discharge Infections in Alcohol-Associated Hepatitis.

Authors:  Daniel D Penrice; Serena Shah; Camille A Kezer; Thoetchai Bee Peeraphatdit; Arun J Sanyal; Brian Davis; Kristin C Mara; Vijay H Shah; Patrick S Kamath; Douglas A Simonetto
Journal:  Hepatol Commun       Date:  2021-07-28

9.  The utility of scoring systems in predicting early and late mortality in alcoholic hepatitis: whose score is it anyway?

Authors:  Naaventhan Palaniyappan; Venkataraman Subramanian; Vidyasagar Ramappa; Stephen D Ryder; Philip Kaye; Guruprasad P Aithal
Journal:  Int J Hepatol       Date:  2012-09-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.