Literature DB >> 16810720

Electrophysiological mapping for the implantation of deep brain stimulators for Parkinson's disease and tremor.

Robert E Gross1, Paul Krack, Maria C Rodriguez-Oroz, Ali R Rezai, Alim-Louis Benabid.   

Abstract

The vast majority of centers use electrophysiological mapping techniques to finalize target selection during the implantation of deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads for the treatment of Parkinson's disease and tremor. This review discusses the techniques used for physiological mapping and addresses the questions of how various mapping strategies modify target selection and outcome following subthalamic nucleus (STN), globus pallidus internus (GPi), and ventralis intermedius (Vim) deep brain stimulation. Mapping strategies vary greatly across centers, but can be broadly categorized into those that use microelectrode or semimicroelectrode techniques to optimize position prior to implantation and macrostimulation through a macroelectrode or the DBS lead, and those that rely solely on macrostimulation and its threshold for clinical effects (benefits and side effects). Microelectrode criteria for implantation into the STN or GPi include length of the nucleus recorded, presence of movement-responsive neurons, and/or distance from the borders with adjacent structures. However, the threshold for the production of clinical benefits relative to side effects is, in most centers, the final, and sometimes only, determinant of DBS electrode position. Macrostimulation techniques for mapping, the utility of microelectrode mapping is reflected in its modification of electrode position in 17% to 87% of patients undergoing STN DBS, with average target adjustments of 1 to 4 mm. Nevertheless, with the absence of class I data, and in consideration of the large number of variables that impact clinical outcome, it is not possible to conclude that one technique is superior to the other in so far as motor Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale outcome is concerned. Moreover, mapping technique is only one out of many variables that determine the outcome. The increase in surgical risk of intracranial hemorrhage correlated to the number of microelectrode trajectories must be considered against the risk of suboptimal benefits related to omission of this technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16810720     DOI: 10.1002/mds.20960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mov Disord        ISSN: 0885-3185            Impact factor:   10.338


  69 in total

1.  Internal structures of the globus pallidus in patients with Parkinson's disease: evaluation with quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM).

Authors:  Satoru Ide; Shingo Kakeda; Issei Ueda; Keita Watanabe; Yu Murakami; Junji Moriya; Atsushi Ogasawara; Koichiro Futatsuya; Toru Sato; Norihiro Ohnari; Kazumasa Okada; Atsuji Matsuyama; Hitoshi Fujiwara; Masanori Hisaoka; Sadatoshi Tsuji; Tian Liu; Yi Wang; Yukunori Korogi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Determination of electrode to nerve fiber distance and nerve conduction velocity through spectral analysis of the extracellular action potentials recorded from earthworm giant fibers.

Authors:  Shaoyu Qiao; Onyekachi Odoemene; Ken Yoshida
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Multicenter study report: electrophysiological monitoring procedures for subthalamic deep brain stimulation surgery in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Sara Marceglia; Simona Mrakic-Sposta; Giorgio Tommasi; Luigi Bartolomei; Camillo Foresti; Franco Valzania; Salvatore Galati; Alessandro Stefani; Filippo Tamma; Alberto Priori
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 4.  Stereotactic implantation of deep brain stimulation electrodes: a review of technical systems, methods and emerging tools.

Authors:  Simone Hemm; Karin Wårdell
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Spatially distinct functional output regions within the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus: implications for an auditory midbrain implant.

Authors:  Hubert H Lim; David J Anderson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Construction of relational topographies from the quantitative measurements of functional deep brain stimulation using a 'roving window' interpolation algorithm.

Authors:  Mahesh B Shenai; Harrison Walker; Stephanie Guthrie; Ray Watts; Barton L Guthrie
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 1.875

7.  Direct visualization of deep brain stimulation targets in patients with Parkinson's disease via 3-T quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Kaijia Yu; Zhiwei Ren; Jianyu Li; Song Guo; Yongsheng Hu; Yongjie Li
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Accuracy of Microelectrode Trajectory Adjustments during DBS Assessed by Intraoperative CT.

Authors:  Sander Bus; Gian Pal; Bichun Ouyang; Pepijn van den Munckhof; Maarten Bot; Sepehr Sani; Leo Verhagen Metman
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 1.875

9.  Encoding of rules by neurons in the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Matthew K Mian; Sameer A Sheth; Shaun R Patel; Konstantinos Spiliopoulos; Emad N Eskandar; Ziv M Williams
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: motor effects relative to the MRI-defined STN.

Authors:  Juergen Ralf Schlaier; Christine Hanson; Annette Janzen; Claudia Fellner; Andreas Hochreiter; Martin Proescholdt; Alexander Brawanski; Max Lange
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.042

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.