Literature DB >> 16810689

Differences of the ipsilateral silent period in small hand muscles.

Patrick Jung1, Ulf Ziemann.   

Abstract

The ipsilateral silent period (iSP) is thought to depend on activity transmitted by the corpus callosum but ipsilateral corticospinal pathways may also contribute. Because the presence of ipsilateral corticospinal pathways differs between small hand muscles, we compared the iSP in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscles. The iSP was elicited in 20 healthy subjects by focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of one primary motor cortex during maximal voluntary contraction of the ipsilateral target muscle. The iSP duration was significantly longer in the FDI than APB because of an irregularly occurring second phase of inhibition in the FDI that was absent in the APB. Although the first phase of inhibition is transmitted by the corpus callosum, we provide evidence that the second phase is mediated through ipsilateral corticospinal pathways. Therefore, for specific assessment of callosal conduction, the iSP should be measured in the APB rather than FDI.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16810689     DOI: 10.1002/mus.20604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  18 in total

1.  Transcallosal sensorimotor fiber tract structure-function relationships.

Authors:  Brett W Fling; Bryan L Benson; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Fundamental differences in callosal structure, neurophysiologic function, and bimanual control in young and older adults.

Authors:  B W Fling; R D Seidler
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Structural and functional asymmetry in the human parietal opercular cortex.

Authors:  Patrick Jung; Ulf Baumgärtner; Peter Stoeter; Rolf-Detlef Treede
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Modulation of transcallosal inhibition by bilateral activation of agonist and antagonist proximal arm muscles.

Authors:  Monica A Perez; Jane E Butler; Janet L Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Evidence for motor cortex dedifferentiation in older adults.

Authors:  Jessica A Bernard; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.673

6.  Interhemispheric interactions between trunk muscle representations of the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Loyda Jean-Charles; Jean-Francois Nepveu; Joan E Deffeyes; Guillaume Elgbeili; Numa Dancause; Dorothy Barthélemy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Adaptation to Leftward Shifting Prisms Alters Motor Interhemispheric Inhibition.

Authors:  Elisa Martín-Arévalo; Selene Schintu; Alessandro Farnè; Laure Pisella; Karen T Reilly
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Task-dependent effects of interhemispheric inhibition on motor control.

Authors:  Brett W Fling; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Multiple measures of corticospinal excitability are associated with clinical features of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  J L Neva; B Lakhani; K E Brown; K P Wadden; C S Mang; N H M Ledwell; M R Borich; I M Vavasour; C Laule; A L Traboulsee; A L MacKay; L A Boyd
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Role of Interhemispheric Cortical Interactions in Poststroke Motor Function.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Palmer; Lewis A Wheaton; Whitney A Gray; Mary Alice Saltão da Silva; Steven L Wolf; Michael R Borich
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.