Literature DB >> 16809988

Interscalene brachial plexus block: can the risk of entering the spinal canal be reduced? A study of needle angles in volunteers undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.

Anand M Sardesai1, Roger Patel, Nicholas M Denny, David K Menon, Adrian K Dixon, Martin J Herrick, Alan W Harrop-Griffiths.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord damage during interscalene brachial plexus block has been attributed to needle entry into the spinal canal. The purpose of this study was to identify the angles and depths of needle insertion that increase the likelihood of such an event, using the traditional classic interscalene approach and two more proximal entry points.
METHOD: Magnetic resonance images of the neck from 10 healthy volunteers were used to obtain the three-dimensional spatial coordinates of three skin markers and the right-sided cervical nerves at the exiting neural foramina. The distance of the intervertebral foramina from the skin markers and the angles of the needle vector and the foramina were calculated.
RESULTS: The distance from the skin to the intervertebral foramen may be as short as 2.5 cm with the classic approach. A caudal angulation greater than 50 degrees seemed to eliminate the risk of needle entry through the foramen.
CONCLUSION: With the classic approach to the interscalene block, there is a greater possibility of the needle passing through the intervertebral foramen if the needle is advanced too deeply. More proximal entry points and techniques that use a more steeply angled needle may reduce the risk of entry into the spinal space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16809988     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200607000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  6 in total

1.  [Interscalene plexus catheters].

Authors:  S Brugger; M W Hollman
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Brachial plexus 3D reconstruction from MRI with dissection validation: a baseline study for clinical applications.

Authors:  Joris Van de Velde; Stephanie Bogaert; Pieter Vandemaele; Wouter Huysse; Eric Achten; Joris Leijnse; Wilfried De Neve; Tom Van Hoof
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 3.  Upper extremity regional anesthesia: essentials of our current understanding, 2008.

Authors:  Joseph M Neal; J C Gerancher; James R Hebl; Brian M Ilfeld; Colin J L McCartney; Carlo D Franco; Quinn H Hogan
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.288

4.  [Epidural malpositioning of an interscalene plexus catheter].

Authors:  P Gaus; B Heb; Z Tanyay; H Müller-Breitenlohner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-07-03       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Applied sonoanatomy of the posterior triangle of the neck.

Authors:  Barys Ihnatsenka; André P Boezaart
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2010-07

6.  Ultrasound-Guided Out-of-Plane vs. In-Plane Interscalene Catheters: A Randomized, Prospective Study.

Authors:  Eric S Schwenk; Kishor Gandhi; Jaime L Baratta; Marc Torjman; Richard H Epstein; Jaeyoon Chung; Benjamin A Vaghari; David Beausang; Elird Bojaxhi; Bernadette Grady
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-12-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.