BACKGROUND: Perioperative nutrition in patients with limited liver function after partial hepatic resection is still controversial. In particular, the significance of perioperative total enteral nutrition remains unresolved. The aim of this review is to investigate the impact of early postoperative total enteral nutrition on convalescence after partial liver resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In an internet-based Medline-Search (time course: 1960-08/2005) a total of five prospective, randomized controlled trials were found comparing the impact of enteral and parenteral nutrition after liver resection. After study validity had been established, a systematic review was undertaken (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, p < 0.05 level of significance; Review Manager 4.2, The Cochrane Collaboration). Primary endpoints were complication rate (infection, organ malfunction) and mortality. Standardized immune parameters were also surveyed. RESULTS: Statistical analysis showed that enteral nutrition resulted in a significantly lower rate (p = 0.04) of wound infection and catheter-related complications than parenteral nutrition did. No statistically significant differences in mortality due to enteral or parenteral nutrition could be found. Patients receiving enteral nutrition showed better postoperative immune competence. CONCLUSION: Early enteral nutrition after liver resection is a safe procedure. Compared to parenteral nutrition it is associated with a decreased incidence of postoperative complications. Facing the inhomogeneity of these trials, especially in nutrition protocols and end points, this first systematic review stresses the need for an update of the importance of early enteral nutrition after liver resection within randomized controlled multicenter trials.
BACKGROUND: Perioperative nutrition in patients with limited liver function after partial hepatic resection is still controversial. In particular, the significance of perioperative total enteral nutrition remains unresolved. The aim of this review is to investigate the impact of early postoperative total enteral nutrition on convalescence after partial liver resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In an internet-based Medline-Search (time course: 1960-08/2005) a total of five prospective, randomized controlled trials were found comparing the impact of enteral and parenteral nutrition after liver resection. After study validity had been established, a systematic review was undertaken (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, p < 0.05 level of significance; Review Manager 4.2, The Cochrane Collaboration). Primary endpoints were complication rate (infection, organ malfunction) and mortality. Standardized immune parameters were also surveyed. RESULTS: Statistical analysis showed that enteral nutrition resulted in a significantly lower rate (p = 0.04) of wound infection and catheter-related complications than parenteral nutrition did. No statistically significant differences in mortality due to enteral or parenteral nutrition could be found. Patients receiving enteral nutrition showed better postoperative immune competence. CONCLUSION: Early enteral nutrition after liver resection is a safe procedure. Compared to parenteral nutrition it is associated with a decreased incidence of postoperative complications. Facing the inhomogeneity of these trials, especially in nutrition protocols and end points, this first systematic review stresses the need for an update of the importance of early enteral nutrition after liver resection within randomized controlled multicenter trials.
Authors: Roberto Ciuni; Antonio Biondi; Giuseppe Grosso; Giuseppe Nunnari; Ettore Panascia; Lisa Randisi; Riccardo Volpes; Antonio Arcadipane; Francesco Basile; Bruno Gridelli; Salvatore Gruttadauria Journal: Updates Surg Date: 2011-11-09
Authors: Emmanuel Melloul; Martin Hübner; Michael Scott; Chris Snowden; James Prentis; Cornelis H C Dejong; O James Garden; Olivier Farges; Norihiro Kokudo; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Nicolas Demartines Journal: World J Surg Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Georg R Linke; Markus Mieth; Stefan Hofer; Birgit Trierweiler-Hauke; Jürgen Weitz; Eike Martin; Markus W Büchler Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2011-03-03 Impact factor: 3.445