Literature DB >> 16809726

Progression-free survival rate as primary end point for phase II cancer clinical trials: application to mesothelioma--The EORTC Lung Cancer Group.

Julie Francart1, Catherine Legrand, Richard Sylvester, Martine Van Glabbeke, Jan P van Meerbeeck, Annie Robert.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Phase II cancer clinical trials play a key role in the development of new drugs. These trials should be designed to accurately determine if the drug should be abandoned or if it is sufficiently promising for further investigation in phase III trials. With new cytostatic agents or when the response assessment is difficult, using the progression-free survival rate (PFSR) at a fixed time point, such as 3, 4, 5, or 6 months, instead of the response rate (RR) as the primary end point is an alternative approach. To design future phase II trials, reference values for PFSRs that correspond to drugs with insufficient (P0) and sufficient (P1) clinical activity (CA) are necessary. This article provides these values in mesothelioma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer database registered ten closed mesothelioma trials (nine phase II trials and one phase III trial) with 523 total patients. Trials were grouped into three categories according to the published RR: significant (n = 259), moderate (n = 142), and insufficient (n = 122) CA.
RESULTS: The PFSRs at 3, 4, 5, and 6 months, respectively, were as follows: 72%, 67%, 51%, and 43% in the group with significant CA; 59%, 51%, 42%, and 35% with moderate CA; and 52%, 40%, 34%, and 28% with insufficient CA.
CONCLUSION: These values may be used to define relevant P0 and P1 values in future phase II mesothelioma trials that use PFSR as the primary end point.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16809726     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.1359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  6 in total

1.  Use of progression-free survival as a valid endpoint in phase II cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Maurie Markman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Two-sample binary phase 2 trials with low type I error and low sample size.

Authors:  Samuel Litwin; Stanley Basickes; Eric A Ross
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Using short-term response information to facilitate adaptive randomization for survival clinical trials.

Authors:  Xuelin Huang; Jing Ning; Yisheng Li; Elihu Estey; Jean-Pierre Issa; Donald A Berry
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  Management options for malignant pleural mesothelioma: clinical and cost considerations.

Authors:  Ranjit K Goudar
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Anne S Tsao; Ignacio Wistuba; Jack A Roth; Hedy Lee Kindler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Pemetrexed plus carboplatin in elderly patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: combined analysis of two phase II trials.

Authors:  G L Ceresoli; B Castagneto; P A Zucali; A Favaretto; M Mencoboni; F Grossi; D Cortinovis; G Del Conte; A Ceribelli; A Bearz; S Salamina; F De Vincenzo; F Cappuzzo; M Marangolo; V Torri; A Santoro
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.