Erika Ringdahl1, John E Delzell, Robin L Kruse. 1. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65212, USA. ringdahle@health.missouri.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The University of Missouri family medicine residency has 297 family physician graduates. We suspected that the practice patterns of graduates were changing. METHODS: All graduates of the residency were surveyed in 1998, 2001, and 2004, asking about practice patterns. To characterize current practice characteristics and scope, we used the latest survey returned by each respondent. We analyzed data for persons who returned all 3 surveys to examine trends across surveys. RESULTS: Annual response rates ranged from 58% to 78%. Of graduates who responded to all 3 surveys, fewer graduates care for patients in the hospital (71.3%, 1998; 56.5%, 2004), practice obstetrics (40.7%, 1998; 23.2%, 2004), or provide primary care for their patients in the emergency department (25.9%, 1998; 13.0%, 2004). Fewer recent graduates perform flexible sigmoidoscopy or exercise electrocardiograms. Graduates who are practicing obstetrics are more likely to be rural or to have graduated since 1994. Those performing flexible sigmoidoscopy are more likely to be male or to have graduated before 1994. The perceived need for more training in practice management is higher for more recent graduates (14.9% for 1975 to 1983 graduates; 31.9% for 1994 to 2003 graduates). CONCLUSIONS: Across the 3 surveys, there was a decline in the proportion of graduates of this family medicine residency program performing procedures, obstetrics, intensive care unit care, or hospital medicine. This study highlights how the practices of family medicine residency graduates may change over time. Data regarding residency graduate practice profiles may help predict the knowledge and skills residency graduates will need in their future practices and evaluate the impact of the Future of Family Medicine recommendations.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The University of Missouri family medicine residency has 297 family physician graduates. We suspected that the practice patterns of graduates were changing. METHODS: All graduates of the residency were surveyed in 1998, 2001, and 2004, asking about practice patterns. To characterize current practice characteristics and scope, we used the latest survey returned by each respondent. We analyzed data for persons who returned all 3 surveys to examine trends across surveys. RESULTS: Annual response rates ranged from 58% to 78%. Of graduates who responded to all 3 surveys, fewer graduates care for patients in the hospital (71.3%, 1998; 56.5%, 2004), practice obstetrics (40.7%, 1998; 23.2%, 2004), or provide primary care for their patients in the emergency department (25.9%, 1998; 13.0%, 2004). Fewer recent graduates perform flexible sigmoidoscopy or exercise electrocardiograms. Graduates who are practicing obstetrics are more likely to be rural or to have graduated since 1994. Those performing flexible sigmoidoscopy are more likely to be male or to have graduated before 1994. The perceived need for more training in practice management is higher for more recent graduates (14.9% for 1975 to 1983 graduates; 31.9% for 1994 to 2003 graduates). CONCLUSIONS: Across the 3 surveys, there was a decline in the proportion of graduates of this family medicine residency program performing procedures, obstetrics, intensive care unit care, or hospital medicine. This study highlights how the practices of family medicine residency graduates may change over time. Data regarding residency graduate practice profiles may help predict the knowledge and skills residency graduates will need in their future practices and evaluate the impact of the Future of Family Medicine recommendations.
Authors: Graham M Dresden; Laura-Mae Baldwin; C Holly A Andrilla; Susan M Skillman; Thomas J Benedetti Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Ariel K Smits; Valerie J King; Rebecca E Rdesinski; Lisa G Dodson; John W Saultz Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2009-06-03 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: R Liisa Jaakkimainen; Susan E Schultz; Richard H Glazier; Caroline Abrahams; Sarita Verma Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2012-03-28 Impact factor: 2.497