Literature DB >> 16809075

Etoposide and illegitimate DNA double-strand break repair in the generation of MLL translocations: new insights and new questions.

P A Sung1, J Libura, C Richardson.   

Abstract

Faithful repair of chromosomal double-strand breaks (DSBs) is central to genome integrity and the suppression of genome rearrangements including translocations that are a hallmark of leukemia, lymphoma, and soft-tissue sarcomas [B. Elliott, M. Jasin, Double-strand breaks and translocations in cancer, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 59 (2002) 373-385; D.C. van Gent, J.H. Hoeijmakers, R. Kanaar, Chromosomal stability and the DNA double-stranded break connection, Nat. Rev. Genet. 2 (2001) 196-206]. Chemotherapy agents that target the essential cellular enzyme topoisomerase II (topo II) are known promoters of DSBs and are associated with therapy-related leukemias. There is a clear clinical association between previous exposure to etoposide and therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) characterized by chromosomal rearrangements involving the mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) gene on chromosome band 11q23 [C.A. Felix, Leukemias related to treatment with DNA topoisomerase II inhibitors, Med. Pediatr. Oncol. 36 (2001) 525-535]. Most MLL rearrangements initiate within a well-characterized 8.3 kb region that contains both putative topo II cleavage recognition sequences and repetitive elements leading to the logical hypothesis that MLL is particularly susceptible to aberrant cleavage and homology-mediated fusion to repetitive elements located on novel chromosome partners. In this review, we will discuss the findings and implications of recent attempts to confirm this hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16809075     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  23 in total

1.  Myeloperoxidase-dependent oxidation of etoposide in human myeloid progenitor CD34+ cells.

Authors:  Irina I Vlasova; Wei-Hong Feng; Julie P Goff; Angela Giorgianni; Duc Do; Susanne M Gollin; Dale W Lewis; Valerian E Kagan; Jack C Yalowich
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 4.436

2.  Evidence for direct involvement of epirubicin in the formation of chromosomal translocations in t(15;17) therapy-related acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Ashley N Mays; Neil Osheroff; Yuanyuan Xiao; Joseph L Wiemels; Carolyn A Felix; Jo Ann W Byl; Kandeepan Saravanamuttu; Andrew Peniket; Robert Corser; Cherry Chang; Christine Hoyle; Anne N Parker; Syed K Hasan; Francesco Lo-Coco; Ellen Solomon; David Grimwade
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  BRG1 promotes the repair of DNA double-strand breaks by facilitating the replacement of RPA with RAD51.

Authors:  Wenjing Qi; Ruoxi Wang; Hongyu Chen; Xiaolin Wang; Ting Xiao; Istvan Boldogh; Xueqing Ba; Liping Han; Xianlu Zeng
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 4.  Revisiting the biology of infant t(4;11)/MLL-AF4+ B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Alejandra Sanjuan-Pla; Clara Bueno; Cristina Prieto; Pamela Acha; Ronald W Stam; Rolf Marschalek; Pablo Menéndez
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Ovarian Aging in Women With BRCA Germline Mutations.

Authors:  Wayne Lin; Shiny Titus; Fred Moy; Elizabeth S Ginsburg; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  ATM modulates the loading of recombination proteins onto a chromosomal translocation breakpoint hotspot.

Authors:  Jiying Sun; Yukako Oma; Masahiko Harata; Kazuteru Kono; Hiroki Shima; Aiko Kinomura; Tsuyoshi Ikura; Hidekazu Suzuki; Shuki Mizutani; Roland Kanaar; Satoshi Tashiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Long-term effects of chromatin remodeling and DNA damage in stem cells induced by environmental and dietary agents.

Authors:  Bhawana Bariar; C Greer Vestal; Christine Richardson
Journal:  J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.567

Review 8.  Recognition of DNA double strand breaks by the BRCA1 tumor suppressor network.

Authors:  Roger A Greenberg
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 9.  Etoposide sensitivity does not predict MLL rearrangements or risk of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  J Yang; A Bogni; C Cheng; W K Bleibel; X Cai; Y Fan; W Yang; J C C Rocha; D Pei; W Liu; M E Dolan; C-H Pui; M V Relling
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 10.  Topoisomerase II and leukemia.

Authors:  Maryjean Pendleton; R Hunter Lindsey; Carolyn A Felix; David Grimwade; Neil Osheroff
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.