Literature DB >> 16808823

Intracranial angioplasty and stenting in the awake patient.

Alex Abou-Chebl1, Derk W Krieger, Christopher T Bajzer, Jay S Yadav.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Endovascular treatment for intracranial atherosclerosis is evolving, but complications remain an issue. Most interventions are performed under general anesthesia, preventing intraprocedural clinical evaluations. We describe our approach to intracranial angioplasty and stenting, using local rather than general anesthesia, and intraprocedural neurological assessment.
METHODS: We prospectively collected procedural and outcome information on all patients undergoing intracranial angioplasty and stenting. Patients underwent interventions under local anesthesia with mild intravenous sedation or analgesia only if needed. Intraoperative neurological evaluations were performed, and symptomatology was used to guide the interventional technique.
RESULTS: Forty-eight arteries in 40 patients with a mean age of 65.2 years were treated. Thirty-two anterior and 16 posterior circulation segments were treated. Technical success was achieved in 100% of patients with reduction of the mean pretreatment stenosis from 85 +/- 8.6% to 7 +/- 10.1%. Stents were deployed in 40 segments; five patients were treated with drug-eluting stents. The cobalt-chromium coronary stents were the easiest to deliver. Thirty-seven patients were treated under local anesthesia and, of those, 61.4% experienced intraprocedural symptoms that led to some alteration of the interventional technique. Headache was the most common symptom, and, when persistent, it heralded the occurrence of subarachnoid hemorrhage. There were seven total neurological complications, but only five (10.5%) led to permanent morbidity (4 strokes) or mortality (1 death).
CONCLUSIONS: Intracranial angioplasty and stenting can be successfully performed using coronary techniques and equipment including drug-eluting stents. Local anesthesia permits neurological evaluations and often leads to the adjustment of the interventional technique, potentially making the procedure safer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16808823     DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2006.00043.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuroimaging        ISSN: 1051-2284            Impact factor:   2.486


  15 in total

Review 1.  Conscious sedation versus general anesthesia during endovascular acute ischemic stroke treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  W Brinjikji; M H Murad; A A Rabinstein; H J Cloft; G Lanzino; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Stenting for the treatment of high-grade intracranial stenoses.

Authors:  S Lanfranconi; A Bersano; V Branca; E Ballabio; M Isalberti; R Papa; L Candelise
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2010-07-04       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  Is general anaesthesia preferable to conscious sedation in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke with intra-arterial mechanical thrombectomy? A review of the literature.

Authors:  N John; P Mitchell; R Dowling; B Yan
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  Management of symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis: endovascular therapy.

Authors:  Mikael Mazighi; Alex Abou-Chebl
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 5.  Indications and applications of arterial stents for stroke prevention in atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis.

Authors:  Jeremy D Fields; Kenneth C Liu; Stanley L Barnwell; Wayne M Clark; Helmi L Lutsep
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Symptom differences and pretreatment asymptomatic interval affect outcomes of stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  M D Alexander; P M Meyers; J D English; T R Stradford; S Sung; W S Smith; V V Halbach; R T Higashida; C F Dowd; D L Cooke; S W Hetts
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Impact of General Anesthesia on Safety and Outcomes in the Endovascular Arm of Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III Trial.

Authors:  Alex Abou-Chebl; Sharon D Yeatts; Bernard Yan; Kevin Cockroft; Mayank Goyal; Tudor Jovin; Pooja Khatri; Phillip Meyers; Judith Spilker; Rebecca Sugg; Katja E Wartenberg; Tom Tomsick; Joe Broderick; Michael D Hill
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  General anesthesia versus monitored anesthesia care during endovascular therapy for vertebrobasilar stroke.

Authors:  Guangjun Hu; Zhen Shi; Bixi Li; Weidong Shao; Bo Xu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

9.  Rate and prognosis of patients under conscious sedation requiring emergent intubation during neuroendovascular procedures.

Authors:  A E Hassan; U Akbar; S A Chaudhry; W G Tekle; R P Tummala; G J Rodriguez; A I Qureshi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Treatment of symptomatic high-grade intracranial stenoses with the balloon-expandable Pharos stent: initial experience.

Authors:  W Kurre; J Berkefeld; M Sitzer; T Neumann-Haefelin; R du Mesnil de Rochemont
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.