Symptoms and signs in particular: the influence of the medical concern on the shape of physician-patient talk.

Talk between physicians and their patients has been shown to be shaped by participant characteristics,phase of the visit, and professional and institutional constraints. Surprisingly, the medical concern that brings the participants together has not been systematically and thoroughly investigated as a shaping influence on such talk. Based on a synthesis of separate interactional sociolinguistic studies of ten different medical concerns involving 395 patients and 105 physicians, I identify seven major differences across medical issues that may shape physician-patient discourse. In this paper I then focus on the first of these seven--the indication of the medical problem. Beginning with the traditional medical distinction between symptoms and signs, I characterize the kinds of evidence introduced by physicians and patients in talk about medical concerns. I then turn to the fuller discourse context of these reports, specifically examining how the indications emerge and play themselves out in the visit. Following Becker (1995b), I identify a two-step 'attunement' process, in which one participant (1) uses language to move toward a clearer understanding of the other's evidence and then displays this emerging understanding, and (2) takes up a stance toward the other's evidence--either corroborating or dismissing it with evidence of his or her own. In closing, I argue the importance of considering the shaping influences of differences across medical concerns, both for discourse analysts in their quest to account for particularities within physician-patient discourse as well as for healthcare professionals who believe that more attuned communication practices can result in better medical practices.