Literature DB >> 16808626

Mortality among radiation workers at Rocketdyne (Atomics International), 1948-1999.

John D Boice1, Sarah S Cohen, Michael T Mumma, Elizabeth Dupree Ellis, Keith F Eckerman, Richard W Leggett, Bruce B Boecker, A Bertrand Brill, Brian E Henderson.   

Abstract

A retrospective cohort mortality study was conducted of workers engaged in nuclear technology development and employed for at least 6 months at Rocketdyne (Atomics International) facilities in California, 1948-1999. Lifetime occupational doses were derived from company records and linkages with national dosimetry data sets. International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP) biokinetic models were used to estimate radiation doses to 16 organs or tissues after the intake of radionuclides. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) compared the observed numbers of deaths with those expected in the general population of California. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate dose-response trends over categories of cumulative radiation dose, combining external and internal organ-specific doses. There were 5,801 radiation workers, including 2,232 monitored for radionuclide intakes. The mean dose from external radiation was 13.5 mSv (maximum 1 Sv); the mean lung dose from external and internal radiation combined was 19.0 mSv (maximum 3.6 Sv). Vital status was determined for 97.6% of the workers of whom 25.3% (n = 1,468) had died. The average period of observation was 27.9 years. All cancers taken together (SMR 0.93; 95% CI 0.84-1.02) and all leukemia excluding chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (SMR 1.21; 95% CI 0.69-1.97) were not significantly elevated. No SMR was significantly increased for any cancer or for any other cause of death. The Cox regression analyses revealed no significant dose-response trends for any cancer. For all cancers excluding leukemia, the RR at 100 mSv was estimated as 1.00 (95% CI 0.81-1.24), and for all leukemia excluding CLL it was 1.34 (95% CI 0.73-2.45). The nonsignificant increase in leukemia (excluding CLL) was in accord with expectation from other radiation studies, but a similar nonsignificant increase in CLL (a malignancy not found to be associated with radiation) tempers a causal interpretation. Radiation exposure has not caused a detectable increase in cancer deaths in this population, but results are limited by small numbers and relatively low career doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16808626     DOI: 10.1667/RR3582.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  10 in total

1.  Groundwater uranium and cancer incidence in South Carolina.

Authors:  Sara E Wagner; James B Burch; Matteo Bottai; Robin Puett; Dwayne Porter; Susan Bolick-Aldrich; Tom Temples; Rebecca C Wilkerson; John E Vena; James R Hébert
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  French cohort of the uranium processing workers: mortality pattern after 30-year follow-up.

Authors:  Irina Guseva Canu; Elisabeth Cardis; Camille Metz-Flamant; Sylvaine Caër-Lorho; Bernard Auriol; Pascal Wild; Dominique Laurier; Margot Tirmarche
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-08-23       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Risk of leukaemia mortality from exposure to ionising radiation in US nuclear workers: a pooled case-control study.

Authors:  Robert D Daniels; Stephen Bertke; Kathleen M Waters; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  The Ukrainian-American study of leukemia and related disorders among Chornobyl cleanup workers from Ukraine: III. Radiation risks.

Authors:  Anatoly Ye Romanenko; Stuart C Finch; Maureen Hatch; Jay H Lubin; Volodymyr G Bebeshko; Dimitry A Bazyka; Nataliya Gudzenko; Irina S Dyagil; Robert F Reiss; Andre Bouville; Vadim V Chumak; Nataliya K Trotsiuk; Nataliya G Babkina; Yuri Belyayev; Ihor Masnyk; Elaine Ron; Geoffrey R Howe; Lydia B Zablotska
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Probability Distribution of Dose and Dose-Rate Effectiveness Factor for use in Estimating Risks of Solid Cancers From Exposure to Low-Let Radiation.

Authors:  David C Kocher; A Iulian Apostoaei; F Owen Hoffman; John R Trabalka
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  Work-related leukemia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ioannis Polychronakis; George Dounias; Vasilios Makropoulos; Elena Riza; Athena Linos
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.646

Review 7.  A meta-analysis of leukaemia risk from protracted exposure to low-dose gamma radiation.

Authors:  R D Daniels; M K Schubauer-Berigan
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 8.  Is cancer risk of radiation workers larger than expected?

Authors:  P Jacob; W Rühm; L Walsh; M Blettner; G Hammer; H Zeeb
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Cancer and non-cancer mortality among French uranium cycle workers: the TRACY cohort.

Authors:  Eric Samson; Irwin Piot; Sergey Zhivin; David B Richardson; Pierre Laroche; Ana-Paula Serond; Dominique Laurier; Olivier Laurent
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Brain cancer incidence rates and the presence of nuclear reactors in US states: a hypothesis-generating study.

Authors:  Mark R Williamson; Marilyn G Klug; Gary G Schwartz
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.609

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.