Literature DB >> 16808595

Singlet oxygen oxidation of isolated and cellular DNA: product formation and mechanistic insights.

Jean Cadet1, Jean-Luc Ravanat, Glaucia R Martinez, Marisa H G Medeiros, Paolo Di Mascio.   

Abstract

This survey focuses on recent aspects of the singlet oxygen oxidation of the guanine moiety of nucleosides, oligonucleotides, isolated and cellular DNA that has been shown to be the exclusive DNA target for this biologically relevant photogenerated oxidant. A large body of mechanistic data is now available from studies performed on nucleosides in both aprotic solvents and aqueous solutions. A common process to both reaction conditions is the formation of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine by reduction of 8-hydroperoxyguanine that arises from the rearrangement of initially formed endoperoxide across the 4,8-bond of the purine moiety. However, in organic solvent the hydroperoxide is converted as a major degradation pathway into a dioxirane that subsequently decomposes into a complex pattern of oxidation products. A different reaction that involved the formation of a highly reactive quinonoid intermediate consecutively to the loss of a water molecule from the 8-hydroperoxide has been shown to occur in aqueous solution. Subsequent addition of a water molecule at C5 leads to the generation of a spiroiminodihy-dantoin compound via a rearrangement that involves an acyl shift. However, in both isolated and cellular DNA the latter decomposition pathway is at the best a minor process, because only 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine has been found to be generated. It is interesting to point out that singlet oxygen has been shown to contribute predominantly to the formation of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine in the DNA of bacterial and human cells upon exposure to UVA radiation. It may be added that the formation of secondary singlet-oxygen oxidation products of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine, including spiroiminodihydantoin and oxaluric acid that were characterized in nucleosides and oligonucleotide, respectively, have not yet been found in cellular DNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16808595     DOI: 10.1562/2006-06-09-IR-914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photochem Photobiol        ISSN: 0031-8655            Impact factor:   3.421


  29 in total

Review 1.  Biologically relevant oxidants and terminology, classification and nomenclature of oxidatively generated damage to nucleobases and 2-deoxyribose in nucleic acids.

Authors:  Jean Cadet; Steffen Loft; Ryszard Olinski; Mark D Evans; Karol Bialkowski; J Richard Wagner; Peter C Dedon; Peter Møller; Marc M Greenberg; Marcus S Cooke
Journal:  Free Radic Res       Date:  2012-02-22

2.  Oxidatively generated DNA damage after Cu(II) catalysis of dopamine and related catecholamine neurotransmitters and neurotoxins: Role of reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Wendy A Spencer; Jeyaprakash Jeyabalan; Sunita Kichambre; Ramesh C Gupta
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 7.376

3.  Photocytotoxicity of the fluorescent nonsteroidal androgen receptor ligand TDPQ.

Authors:  Piotr J Bilski; Boris Risek; Colin F Chignell; William T Schrader
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 3.421

4.  Wavelength dependence of ultraviolet radiation-induced DNA damage as determined by laser irradiation suggests that cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers are the principal DNA lesions produced by terrestrial sunlight.

Authors:  Ahmad Besaratinia; Jae-In Yoon; Christi Schroeder; Stephen E Bradforth; Myles Cockburn; Gerd P Pfeifer
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Characterization of Apolipoprotein C3 (Apo C3) LNA/DNA Impurities and Degradation Products by LC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Olga V Friese; Justin B Sperry; Yan He; Liji Joseph; James A Carroll; Jason C Rouse
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  Single cell responses to spatially controlled photosensitized production of extracellular singlet oxygen.

Authors:  Brian W Pedersen; Louise E Sinks; Thomas Breitenbach; Nickolass B Schack; Sergei A Vinogradov; Peter R Ogilby
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.421

Review 7.  Formation and processing of DNA damage substrates for the hNEIL enzymes.

Authors:  Aaron M Fleming; Cynthia J Burrows
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2016-11-20       Impact factor: 7.376

8.  Riboflavin activated by ultraviolet A1 irradiation induces oxidative DNA damage-mediated mutations inhibited by vitamin C.

Authors:  Ahmad Besaratinia; Sang-In Kim; Steven E Bates; Gerd P Pfeifer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Photodynamic Therapy for Cancer and for Infections: What Is the Difference?

Authors:  Sulbha K Sharma; Pawel Mroz; Tianhong Dai; Ying-Ying Huang; Tyler G St Denis; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Isr J Chem       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Proteasome inhibition potentiates antitumor effects of photodynamic therapy in mice through induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response.

Authors:  Angelika Szokalska; Marcin Makowski; Dominika Nowis; Grzegorz M Wilczynski; Marek Kujawa; Cezary Wójcik; Izabela Mlynarczuk-Bialy; Pawel Salwa; Jacek Bil; Sylwia Janowska; Patrizia Agostinis; Tom Verfaillie; Marek Bugajski; Jan Gietka; Tadeusz Issat; Eliza Glodkowska; Piotr Mrówka; Tomasz Stoklosa; Michael R Hamblin; Pawel Mróz; Marek Jakóbisiak; Jakub Golab
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.