OBJECTIVE: To compare the prediction of unerupted permanent canine and premolar size of a comparable sample size of southern Chinese population with that of the study of Tanaka and Johnston. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Teeth on study casts of an unselected sample from a 12-year-old Hong Kong Oral Health Survey of 12-year-old children (n = 459; 295 males and 164 females) were measured in the mesiodistal dimension. A Chinese mixed dentition analysis based on the Tanaka and Johnston method was constructed with linear regression equations for prediction of the mesiodistal widths of unerupted canines and premolars. RESULTS: Sexual dimorphism was evident between southern Chinese males and females in incisors, canines, and premolars in the mesiodistal dimension. CONCLUSIONS: To predict the space (in mm) required for alignment of unerupted canine and premolars in southern Chinese children, halve the sum of the mesiodistal dimensions of the four mandibular incisors and add the respective constants for males (upper, 11.5; lower, 10.5) or females (upper, 11.0; lower, 10.0).
OBJECTIVE: To compare the prediction of unerupted permanent canine and premolar size of a comparable sample size of southern Chinese population with that of the study of Tanaka and Johnston. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Teeth on study casts of an unselected sample from a 12-year-old Hong Kong Oral Health Survey of 12-year-old children (n = 459; 295 males and 164 females) were measured in the mesiodistal dimension. A Chinese mixed dentition analysis based on the Tanaka and Johnston method was constructed with linear regression equations for prediction of the mesiodistal widths of unerupted canines and premolars. RESULTS: Sexual dimorphism was evident between southern Chinese males and females in incisors, canines, and premolars in the mesiodistal dimension. CONCLUSIONS: To predict the space (in mm) required for alignment of unerupted canine and premolars in southern Chinese children, halve the sum of the mesiodistal dimensions of the four mandibular incisors and add the respective constants for males (upper, 11.5; lower, 10.5) or females (upper, 11.0; lower, 10.0).
Authors: Yousef H Al-Dlaigan; Nasser D Alqahtani; Khalid Almoammar; Thikriat Al-Jewair; Fahad Bin Salamah; Mohamme Alswilem; Sahar F Albarakati Journal: Pak J Med Sci Date: 2015 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.088
Authors: See Yen Chong; Lwin Moe Aung; Yu-Hwa Pan; Wei-Jen Chang; Chi-Yang Tsai Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 3.390