Literature DB >> 16808475

Use of elemental analysis to determine comparative performance of established DNA quantification methods.

Claire A English1, Sheila Merson, Jacquie T Keer.   

Abstract

Quantification of genomic DNA is critical for many analyses in molecular biology. Current methods include optical density (OD) measurements or fluorescent enhancement but both approaches have limitations on achievable accuracy. In this study we performed an elemental analysis to quantify genomic DNA to provide an independent value for comparing the performance of four quantification methods. Specifically ICP-OES (inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy) was used to assign a concentration value to a DNA stock solution, based on the stoichiometry of phosphorus within the molecule. Two absorbance- and two fluorescence-based methods were then used to quantify the same DNA solution using replicate analyses. The precision of each method was assessed by measurement of replicate spread (coefficient of variation) and trueness by t-test. Results showed that performance of the methods was variable, both in terms of concordance with the independent ICP-OES value and repeatability of data. While need for expensive equipment and technical expertise may preclude widespread replacement of more traditional methods for DNA quantification, use of primary methods such as ICP-OES analysis for production of accurate calibrants may increase quantitative accuracy and give greater appreciation of the true performance of current methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16808475     DOI: 10.1021/ac060174k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  4 in total

1.  Impacts of inter- and intralaboratory variations on the reproducibility of microbial community analyses.

Authors:  Yao Pan; Levente Bodrossy; Peter Frenzel; Anne-Grethe Hestnes; Sascha Krause; Claudia Lüke; Marion Meima-Franke; Henri Siljanen; Mette M Svenning; Paul L E Bodelier
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Possible errors in the interpretation of ethidium bromide and PicoGreen DNA staining results from ethidium monoazide-treated DNA.

Authors:  Ingeborg Hein; Gabriele Flekna; Martin Wagner; Andreas Nocker; Anne K Camper
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Considerations for accurate gene expression measurement by reverse transcription quantitative PCR when analysing clinical samples.

Authors:  Rebecca Sanders; Deborah J Mason; Carole A Foy; Jim F Huggett
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 4.142

4.  Polydeoxyribonucleotide-delivering therapeutic hydrogel for diabetic wound healing.

Authors:  Da Yong Shin; Ji-Ung Park; Min-Ha Choi; Sukwha Kim; Hyoun-Ee Kim; Seol-Ha Jeong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.