Literature DB >> 16807944

Impact of the availability of sonography in the acute gynecology unit.

Z Haider1, G Condous, A Khalid, E Kirk, F Mukri, B Van Calster, D Timmerman, T Bourne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The initial assessment of acute gynecology patients is usually based on history and clinical examination and does not involve ultrasound. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the availability of transvaginal sonography at the time of initial assessment of the emergency gynecology patient.
METHODS: This was a prospective observational study carried out over a 5-month period in the acute gynecology unit of an inner London teaching hospital. Women were assessed in the routine manner by history-taking and clinical examination and questionnaires were completed by the doctors, including details of the intention to treat. Transvaginal ultrasound examinations were then performed and a second diagnosis and management plan were made utilizing the extra information from the scan. The plans for clinical management before and after the ultrasound examination were compared.
RESULTS: We originally recruited 1000 consecutive women to the study. The mean age was 31.1 (SD, 9.81) years. Complete data were available for 920 (92%). 84 (9.1%) women did not require a scan. Of the 521 women with a positive pregnancy test, 75.6% were reassured immediately that their pregnancy was intrauterine. 143 women (27.4%) were given the diagnosis of a suspected ectopic pregnancy before sonography, compared with 29 (5.6%) after. Following the ultrasound examination there was a change in clinical management in 54.1% of the women with a positive pregnancy test and a reduction in admissions (including inpatient theater admissions) (from 40.3% to 17.1%) and outpatient follow-up examinations (from 41.1% to 35.5%). In 90 (23.8%) non-pregnant women a significant ovarian cyst (> 5 cm) was suspected clinically; 28/90 (31.1%) were confirmed on sonography. Following the ultrasound examination there was a change in clinical management for 38.1% of non-pregnant women and a reduction in admissions (from 37.1% to 19.4%) and outpatient follow-up examinations (from 25.7% to 18.1%).
CONCLUSION: It appears that the availability of transvaginal sonography at the time of initial assessment of emergency gynecology patients improves diagnostic accuracy and reduces unnecessary admissions and follow-up examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16807944     DOI: 10.1002/uog.2801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  6 in total

Review 1.  Non-invasive tools for the diagnosis of potentially life-threatening gynaecological emergencies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Viola Polena; Cyrille Huchon; Catalina Varas Ramos; Roman Rouzier; Alexandre Dumont; Arnaud Fauconnier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Optimal Combination of Non-Invasive Tools for the Early Detection of Potentially Life-Threatening Emergencies in Gynecology.

Authors:  Catalina Varas; Marion Ravit; Camille Mimoun; Pierre Panel; Cyrille Huchon; Arnaud Fauconnier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Implementing the transvaginal ultrasound simulation training (TRUSST) programme for obstetric registrars.

Authors:  Sally Byford; Sarah Janssens; Rachel Cook
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2021-01-12

4.  Differences in the organisation of early pregnancy units and the effect of senior clinician presence, volume of patients and weekend opening on emergency hospital admissions: Findings from the VESPA Study.

Authors:  Maria Memtsa; Venetia Goodhart; Gareth Ambler; Peter Brocklehurst; Edna Keeney; Sergio A Silverio; Zacharias Anastasiou; Jeff Round; Nazim Khan; Jennifer Hall; Geraldine Barrett; Ruth Bender-Atik; Judith Stephenson; Davor Jurkovic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Routine ultrasound examination by OB/GYN residents increase the accuracy of diagnosis for emergency surgery in gynecology.

Authors:  Flavie Toret-Labeeuw; Cyrille Huchon; Thomas Popowski; Anne A Chantry; Alexandre Dumont; Arnaud Fauconnier
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Gynecological emergency ultrasound in daytime and at night: differences that cannot be ignored.

Authors:  Bin-Bin Jin; Yi-Zhen Gong; Yan Ma; Zhong-Hui He
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.423

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.