Literature DB >> 16807739

[Misinterpretation of anterior pelvic ring fractures in the elderly].

G Tosounidis1, R Wirbel, U Culemann, T Pohlemann.   

Abstract

Clinical outcome following pelvic ring fractures of AO/OTA type-A in the elderly is often unsatisfying because the posterior pelvic ring fracture is underdiagnosed and patients with type B fractures were conservatively treated like patients with type A fractures. This so-called "A-B" problem was systematically analyzed in our patients with pelvic ring fractures. 183 patients were treated with pelvic ring fractures. Primarily, the injuries were classified as follows: 81 type A, 38 type B, and 64 type C. The diagnosis was changed from type A to type B injury in seven patients. Parameters of investigation included fracture type, duration of symptoms, treatment, and outcome score according to the German Multicenter Study Group Pelvis. Persistent pain in the sacral area over an average of 2 (1-6) weeks was found in all patients. The CT scan revealed in all patients a transalar sacral impression fracture in the sense of an internal rotationally unstable injury of type AO/OTA B 2.1. The treatment consisted in a supra-acetabular external fixator for an average of 3 weeks. After 4 weeks the mean pelvis outcome score was 9 (7-10) points. In cases of persistent pain for more than 2 weeks after transpubic pelvic ring fractures in the elderly further investigation by CT scan should be recommended to exclude a concomitant sacral fracture, which then could be safely treated by a supra-acetabular external fixator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16807739     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-006-1098-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  10 in total

1.  Surgical management of pelvic ring disruptions. Indications, techniques and functional results.

Authors:  P M Rommens; P M Vanderschot; P De Boodt; P L Broos
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  The long-term results of nonoperatively treated major pelvic disruptions.

Authors:  R C Henderson
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Sacral fractures: an important problem. Retrospective analysis of 236 cases.

Authors:  F Denis; S Davis; T Comfort
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Clinical effectiveness of the physical examination in diagnosis of posterior pelvic ring injuries.

Authors:  Joseph P McCormick; Steven J Morgan; Wade R Smith
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 5.  Pelvic ring fractures: should they be fixed?

Authors:  M Tile
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1988-01

6.  Occult injuries of the pelvic ring.

Authors:  S D Gertzbein; D R Chenoweth
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Predictive value of the hip flexion test for fractures of the pelvis.

Authors:  S J Ham; A D van Walsum; P A Vierhout
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Outcome after pelvic ring injuries.

Authors:  T Pohlemann; A Gänsslen; O Schellwald; U Culemann; H Tscherne
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  [Pelvic fractures: epidemiology, therapy and long-term outcome. Overview of the multicenter study of the Pelvis Study Group].

Authors:  T Pohlemann; H Tscherne; F Baumgärtel; H J Egbers; E Euler; F Maurer; M Fell; E Mayr; W W Quirini; W Schlickewei; A Weinberg
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  [Pelvic fracture. Diagnostics and current treatment options].

Authors:  U Culemann; G Tosounidis; H Reilmann; T Pohlemann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 0.955

  10 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  [Influence of the pelvic trauma registry of the DGU on treatment of pelvic ring fractures].

Authors:  J H Holstein; F M Stuby; S C Herath; U Culemann; E Aghayev; T Pohlemann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  [Osteoporotic fractures of the pelvis].

Authors:  J Böhme; A Höch; C Josten
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Osteoporotic Pelvic Fractures.

Authors:  Ludwig Oberkircher; Steffen Ruchholtz; Pol Maria Rommens; Alexander Hofmann; Benjamin Bücking; Antonio Krüger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  [Insufficiency fractures of the pelvic ring].

Authors:  F M Stuby; A Schäffler; T Haas; B König; U Stöckle; T Freude
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  [Radiological diagnosis of pelvic ring fractures].

Authors:  Thomas Grieser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Surgical management of osteoporotic pelvic fractures: a new challenge.

Authors:  P M Rommens; D Wagner; A Hofmann
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 3.693

7.  Outcome and 2-Year Survival Rate in Elderly Patients With Lateral Compression Fractures of the Pelvis.

Authors:  Andreas Höch; Orkun Özkurtul; Philipp Pieroh; Christoph Josten; Jörg Böhme
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2016-12-14

8.  Instability of the posterior pelvic ring: introduction of innovative implants.

Authors:  Dirk Wähnert; Thomas Vordemvenne; Niklas Grüneweller
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 2.359

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.