Literature DB >> 16807099

Auditory processing during deep propofol sedation and recovery from unconsciousness.

Stefan Koelsch1, Wolfgang Heinke, Daniela Sammler, Derk Olthoff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Using evoked potentials, this study investigated effects of deep propofol sedation, and effects of recovery from unconsciousness, on the processing of auditory information with stimuli suited to elicit a physical MMN, and a (music-syntactic) ERAN.
METHODS: Levels of sedation were assessed using the Bispectral Index (BIS) and the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation Scale (MOAAS). EEG-measurements were performed during wakefulness, deep propofol sedation (MOAAS 2-3, mean BIS=68), and a recovery period. Between deep sedation and recovery period, the infusion rate of propofol was increased to achieve unconsciousness (MOAAS 0-1, mean BIS=35); EEG measurements of recovery period were performed after subjects regained consciousness.
RESULTS: During deep sedation, the physical MMN was markedly reduced, but still significant. No ERAN was observed in this level. A clear P3a was elicited during deep sedation by those deviants, which were task-relevant during the awake state. As soon as subjects regained consciousness during the recovery period, a normal MMN was elicited. By contrast, the P3a was absent in the recovery period, and the P3b was markedly reduced.
CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that the auditory sensory memory (as indexed by the physical MMN) is still active, although strongly reduced, during deep sedation (MOAAS 2-3). The presence of the P3a indicates that attention-related processes are still operating during this level. Processes of syntactic analysis appear to be abolished during deep sedation. After propofol-induced anesthesia, the auditory sensory memory appears to operate normal as soon as subjects regain consciousness, whereas the attention-related processes indexed by P3a and P3b are markedly impaired. SIGNIFICANCE: Results inform about effects of sedative drugs on auditory and attention-related mechanisms. The findings are important because these mechanisms are prerequisites for auditory awareness, auditory learning and memory, as well as language perception during anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16807099     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  25 in total

Review 1.  How human electrophysiology informs psychopharmacology: from bottom-up driven processing to top-down control.

Authors:  J Leon Kenemans; Seppo Kähkönen
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 2.  A roadmap for the study of conscious audition and its neural basis.

Authors:  Andrew R Dykstra; Peter A Cariani; Alexander Gutschalk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  [Influence of intraoperative noise protection on postoperative pain: demonstrated exemplified by total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  A Keshmiri; T Wolf; O Wiech; A Benditz; J Grifka; H Springorum
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  Dynamic Interactions between Top-Down Expectations and Conscious Awareness.

Authors:  Erik L Meijs; Heleen A Slagter; Floris P de Lange; Simon van Gaal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Synaptic plasticity as a cortical coding scheme.

Authors:  Robert C Froemke; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Disruption of hierarchical predictive coding during sleep.

Authors:  Melanie Strauss; Jacobo D Sitt; Jean-Remi King; Maxime Elbaz; Leila Azizi; Marco Buiatti; Lionel Naccache; Virginie van Wassenhove; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Auditory evoked fields measured noninvasively with small-animal MEG reveal rapid repetition suppression in the guinea pig.

Authors:  G Björn Christianson; Maria Chait; Alain de Cheveigné; Jennifer F Linden
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Effects of Music Listening on Cortisol Levels and Propofol Consumption during Spinal Anesthesia.

Authors:  Stefan Koelsch; Julian Fuermetz; Ulrich Sack; Katrin Bauer; Maximilian Hohenadel; Martin Wiegel; Udo X Kaisers; Wolfgang Heinke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-04-05

9.  Memory-based mismatch response to frequency changes in rats.

Authors:  Piia Astikainen; Gabor Stefanics; Miriam Nokia; Arto Lipponen; Fengyu Cong; Markku Penttonen; Timo Ruusuvirta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cerebral responses to local and global auditory novelty under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Lynn Uhrig; David Janssen; Stanislas Dehaene; Béchir Jarraya
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.