Literature DB >> 16806724

The timing is right: Evolution of AIDS-causing HIV strains is consistent with history of chloroquine use.

G E Parris.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16806724      PMCID: PMC7130464          DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Hypotheses        ISSN: 0306-9877            Impact factor:   1.538


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Sir, Consistent with my hypothesis [1], chloroquine has been shown to act against both HIV/AIDS [2] and coronavirus/SARS [3]. Anti-viral activity creates an ecological stress that will cause evolution toward resistance in these non-targeted viruses just as in the case of the targeted malaria organism [4]. Exposure to chloroquine has undoubtedly caused evolution of these viruses. Korber et al. [5] projected that the common ancestor of the disease-causing strains of HIV likely existed in humans for an undetermined time (presumably without casing disease) and began its evolution into disease-causing strains circa 1931 (1915–1941, 95% confidence interval). Although the absolute timing has been disputed, Korber’s figures [5] suggest that the evolution of HIV was in two spurts (i.e., not random over time and not one unique event). The major families (HIV-1A, B/D, C, J, H and F) all appear to have been founded near the beginning of the evolution. There was then a lull in evolution (i.e., mutations continued to occur at about 10−3 per bp per year [5], but there was no selection of new strains). After the lull, almost all the families (A, B, C, D and F) split into numerous sub-strains starting at about the same time (circa 1955) and continuing. 4-Aminoquinoline anti-malarials were first synthesized in 1934. The pattern as well as the timing of selected HIV strains [5] are consistent with the testing of 4-aminoquinoline anti-malarials in the Congo (1935–1940), suspension of use (1940–1955), followed by widespread and continuous use of chloroquine (1955–1990). The WHO launched a world-wide malaria eradication program in 1955. In sub-Saharan Africa, eradication of mosquitoes with DDT was considered impractical, but chloroquine was used at high levels [4].
  5 in total

1.  Timing the ancestor of the HIV-1 pandemic strains.

Authors:  B Korber; M Muldoon; J Theiler; F Gao; R Gupta; A Lapedes; B H Hahn; S Wolinsky; T Bhattacharya
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-06-09       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  History and importance of antimalarial drug resistance.

Authors:  U D'Alessandro; H Buttiëns
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.

Authors:  Martin J Vincent; Eric Bergeron; Suzanne Benjannet; Bobbie R Erickson; Pierre E Rollin; Thomas G Ksiazek; Nabil G Seidah; Stuart T Nichol
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 4.099

Review 4.  Effects of chloroquine on viral infections: an old drug against today's diseases?

Authors:  Andrea Savarino; Johan R Boelaert; Antonio Cassone; Giancarlo Majori; Roberto Cauda
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 25.071

5.  Hypothesis links emergence of chloroquine-resistant malaria and other intracellular pathogens and suggests a new strategy for treatment of diseases caused by intracellular parasites.

Authors:  George E Parris
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.538

  5 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Targeting endosomal acidification by chloroquine analogs as a promising strategy for the treatment of emerging viral diseases.

Authors:  Md Abdul Alim Al-Bari
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2017-01-23

2.  AIDS: caused by development of resistance to drugs in a non-target intracellular parasite.

Authors:  George E Parris
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 1.538

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.