Literature DB >> 16806236

Artificial composite bone as a model of human trabecular bone: the implant-bone interface.

J A Grant1, N E Bishop, N Götzen, C Sprecher, M Honl, M M Morlock.   

Abstract

The use of artificial bones in implant testing has become popular due to their low variability and ready availability. However, friction coefficients, which are critical to load transfer in uncemented implants, have rarely been compared between human and artificial bone, particularly for wet and dry conditions. In this study, the static and dynamic friction coefficients for four commercially used titanium surfaces (polished, Al(2)O(3) blasted, plasma sprayed, beaded) acting on the trabecular component of artificial bones (Sawbones) were compared to those for human trabecular bone. Artificial bones were tested in dry and wet conditions and normal interface stress was varied (0.25, 0.5, 1.0MPa). Friction coefficients were mostly lower for artificial bones than real bone. In particular, static friction coefficients for the dry polished surface were 20% of those for real bone and 42-61% for the dry beaded surface, with statistical significance (alpha<0.05). Less marked differences were observed for dynamic friction coefficients. Significant but non-systematic effects of normal stress or wet/dry condition on friction coefficients were observed within each surface type. These results indicate that the use of artificial bone models for pre-clinical implant testing that rely on interface load transfer with trabecular bone for mechanical integrity can be particularly sensitive to surface finish and lubrication conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16806236     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  21 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical behaviours of the bone-implant interface: a review.

Authors:  Xing Gao; Manon Fraulob; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Nonlinear finite element analysis of three implant- abutment interface designs.

Authors:  Chun-Bo Tang; Si-Yu Liul; Guo-Xing Zhou; Jin-Hua Yu; Guang-Dong Zhang; Yi-Dong Bao; Qiu-Ju Wang
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.344

3.  Fatigue behavior of Ilizarov frame versus tibial interlocking nail in a comminuted tibial fracture model: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Erik Hasenboehler; Wade R Smith; Laurence Laudicina; Giby C Philips; Philip F Stahel; Steven J Morgan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  2D FEA of evaluation of micromovements and stresses at bone-implant interface in immediately loaded tapered implants in the posterior maxilla.

Authors:  Shrikar R Desai; Rika Singh; I Karthikeyan
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2013-09

5.  Validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical studies on implant supported prosthesis--tension tests.

Authors:  Mariane Miyashiro; Valdey Suedam; Rafael Tobias Moretti Neto; Paulo Martins Ferreira; José Henrique Rubo
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Intrinsic Osteoinductivity of Porous Titanium Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Maryam Tamaddon; Sorousheh Samizadeh; Ling Wang; Gordon Blunn; Chaozong Liu
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2017-07-26

7.  3D finite element analysis of immediate loading of single wide versus double implants for replacing mandibular molar.

Authors:  Shrikar R Desai; I Karthikeyan; Reetika Gaddale
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2013-11

8.  Load distribution between cephalic screws in a dual lag screw trochanteric nail.

Authors:  Julia Henschel; Sebastian Eberle; Peter Augat
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Effects of implant tilting and the loading direction on the displacement and micromotion of immediately loaded implants: an in vitro experiment and finite element analysis.

Authors:  Tsutomu Sugiura; Kazuhiko Yamamoto; Satoshi Horita; Kazuhiro Murakami; Sadami Tsutsumi; Tadaaki Kirita
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.614

10.  Biomechanical Measurement Error Can Be Caused by Fujifilm Thickness: A Theoretical, Experimental, and Computational Analysis.

Authors:  Ahmed Sarwar; Simli Srivastava; Chris Chu; Alan Machin; Emil H Schemitsch; Habiba Bougherara; Zahra S Bagheri; Radovan Zdero
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.