BACKGROUND: Verbal declarative memory is a core deficit in schizophrenia patients, seen to a lesser extent in unaffected biological relatives. Neuroimaging studies suggest volumetric differences and aberrant function in prefrontal and temporal regions in schizophrenia patients compared to controls. These deficits are also reflected in the small number of similar investigations in unaffected biological relatives. However, it is unclear the extent to which dysfunction is genetically mediated or a feature of the established illness. METHOD: Event-related blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to measure brain activation in 68 biological relatives of schizophrenia patients (of whom 27 experienced transient or isolated psychotic symptoms) and 21 controls during verbal classification and recognition. RESULTS: During word classification, the high-risk group showed a greater response relative to controls in the right inferior frontal gyrus. During correct recognition (relative to correct rejection), the high-risk group showed significantly greater response relative to controls in the right cerebellum. When the high-risk group was split into those with (HR+) and without (HR-) psychotic symptoms, the increased response in the right inferior frontal gyrus was only seen when the HR+ were compared to controls. The greater cerebellar response was seen when both HR groups were compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Activation increases in the right inferior frontal gyrus and cerebellum in high-risk subjects compared to controls during a relatively low-load memory task are likely to represent compensation for genetically mediated abnormalities. This is consistent with a leftward shift of the inverted 'U' load-response model of cognitive function in schizophrenia.
BACKGROUND: Verbal declarative memory is a core deficit in schizophreniapatients, seen to a lesser extent in unaffected biological relatives. Neuroimaging studies suggest volumetric differences and aberrant function in prefrontal and temporal regions in schizophreniapatients compared to controls. These deficits are also reflected in the small number of similar investigations in unaffected biological relatives. However, it is unclear the extent to which dysfunction is genetically mediated or a feature of the established illness. METHOD: Event-related blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to measure brain activation in 68 biological relatives of schizophreniapatients (of whom 27 experienced transient or isolated psychotic symptoms) and 21 controls during verbal classification and recognition. RESULTS: During word classification, the high-risk group showed a greater response relative to controls in the right inferior frontal gyrus. During correct recognition (relative to correct rejection), the high-risk group showed significantly greater response relative to controls in the right cerebellum. When the high-risk group was split into those with (HR+) and without (HR-) psychotic symptoms, the increased response in the right inferior frontal gyrus was only seen when the HR+ were compared to controls. The greater cerebellar response was seen when both HR groups were compared to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Activation increases in the right inferior frontal gyrus and cerebellum in high-risk subjects compared to controls during a relatively low-load memory task are likely to represent compensation for genetically mediated abnormalities. This is consistent with a leftward shift of the inverted 'U' load-response model of cognitive function in schizophrenia.
Authors: H W Thermenos; S Whitfield-Gabrieli; L J Seidman; G Kuperberg; R J Juelich; S Divatia; C Riley; G A Jabbar; M E Shenton; M Kubicki; T Manschreck; M S Keshavan; L E DeLisi Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2013-10-28 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Tejas S Bhojraj; Konasale M Prasad; Shaun M Eack; Alan N Francis; Debra M Montrose; Matcheri S Keshavan Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Lee Friedman; Jessica A Turner; Hal Stern; Daniel H Mathalon; Liv C Trondsen; Steven G Potkin Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-01-05 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Markus Thimm; Axel Krug; Valentin Markov; Sören Krach; Andreas Jansen; Klaus Zerres; Thomas Eggermann; Tony Stöcker; Nadim Jon Shah; Markus M Nöthen; Marcella Rietschel; Tilo Kircher Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Sergi G Costafreda; Cynthia H Y Fu; Marco Picchioni; Fergus Kane; Colm McDonald; Diana P Prata; Sridevi Kalidindi; Muriel Walshe; Vivienne Curtis; Elvira Bramon; Eugenia Kravariti; Nicolette Marshall; Timothea Toulopoulou; Gareth J Barker; Anthony S David; Michael J Brammer; Robin M Murray; Philip K McGuire Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Stephen M Lawrie; Andrew M McIntosh; Jeremy Hall; David G C Owens; Eve C Johnstone Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2008-01-27 Impact factor: 9.306