Literature DB >> 16804951

Reports of hyperkalemia after publication of RALES--a pharmacovigilance study.

Manfred Hauben1, Lester Reich, Charles M Gerrits.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A population-based study and anecdotal reports have indicated that the publication of the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study (RALES) was associated with not merely a broader use of spironolactone in the treatment of heart failure, but also with a coinciding sharp increase in hyperkalemia-associated morbidity/mortality in patients also being treated with ACE-inhibitors. Data mining algorithms (DMAs) are being applied to spontaneous reporting system (SRS) databases in hopes of obtaining early warnings/additional insights into post-licensure safety data. We applied two DMAs (i.e. multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker [MGPS] and proportional reporting ratios [PRRs]) to spontaneous reporting system (SRS) data to determine if these DMAs could have provided an earlier indication of a possible hyperkalemia safety issue.
METHODS: MGPS and PRRs were retrospectively applied to US FDA-AERS, an SRS database. Year-by-year analysis and analysis of increasing cumulative time intervals were performed on cases in which both spironolactone and hyperkalemia and possibly related cardiac events had been reported.
RESULTS: Neither of the DMAs initially provided a compelling signal of disproportionate reporting (SDR) for hyperkalemia after publication of RALES. However, using events consistent with clinical sequelae of hyperkalemia (e.g,. sudden death), SDRs were identified with PRRs.
CONCLUSIONS: The quality and usefulness of data mining analysis is highly situation dependent and may vary with the knowledge and experience of the drug safety reviewer. Our analysis suggests that contemporary DMAs may have significant limitations in detecting increased frequency of labeled events in real-life prospective pharmacovigilance. There is a paucity of research in this area and we recommend further research for new approaches to detecting increased frequency of labeled events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16804951     DOI: 10.1002/pds.1275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  5 in total

1.  Effect of Lawyer-Submitted Reports on Signals of Disproportional Reporting in the Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System.

Authors:  James R Rogers; Ameet Sarpatwari; Rishi J Desai; Justin M Bohn; Nazleen F Khan; Aaron S Kesselheim; Michael A Fischer; Joshua J Gagne; John G Connolly
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Detection of spironolactone-associated hyperkalaemia following the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study (RALES).

Authors:  Manfred Hauben; Lester Reich; Charles M Gerrits; David Madigan
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Data mining of the public version of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Sakaeda; Akiko Tamon; Kaori Kadoyama; Yasushi Okuno
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Detecting associations between behavioral addictions and dopamine agonists in the Food & Drug Administration's Adverse Event database.

Authors:  Katherine E Gendreau; Marc N Potenza
Journal:  J Behav Addict       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 6.756

5.  Factors Affecting the Timing of Signal Detection of Adverse Drug Reactions.

Authors:  Masayuki Hashiguchi; Shungo Imai; Keiko Uehara; Junya Maruyama; Mikiko Shimizu; Mayumi Mochizuki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.